My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
PC-2004-29
City of Pleasanton
>
BOARDS AND COMMISSIONS
>
PLANNING
>
RESOLUTIONS
>
2000-2009
>
2004
>
PC-2004-29
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/15/2006 9:32:31 AM
Creation date
3/16/2005 3:11:59 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CITY CLERK
CITY CLERK - TYPE
RESOLUTIONS
DOCUMENT DATE
4/28/2004
DOCUMENT NO
PC-2004-29
DOCUMENT NAME
PUD-28
NOTES
REGIS LACHANCE
NOTES 3
TO REZONE 12,400 SQ. FT PARCEL INTO TWO LOTS
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
18
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />Resolution No. PC-2004-29 <br />Page Two <br /> <br />2. The proposed development plan is consistent with the City's General Plan <br />and any applicable specific plan. <br /> <br />The proposed density of seven dwelling units per acre is within the two-to-eight <br />dwelling units per acre MDR range, but it would exceed the General Plan's <br />midpoint density of five dwelling units per acre. The smaller, and, therefore, <br />more affordable house size on Lot B and the proposed Green Building measures <br />provide acceptable "public amenities" for purposes of allowing the density to <br />exceed the General Plan midpoint. The small house size would also be consistent <br />with Housing Element Policy 32 that strongly encourages housing developers to <br />build small housing units. The project would be consistent with the Downtown <br />Specific Plan Design Policies such as protecting the West Side neighborhood <br />around St. Mary Street and Division Street from new construction unrelated to the <br />density, size, and character of the neighborhood, avoiding excessive lot coverage, <br />and maintaining appropriate separations between buildings. Therefore, this <br />finding can be made. <br /> <br />3. The proposed development plan is compatible with previously developed <br />properties in the vicinity and the natural, topographic features of the site. <br /> <br />The site is an infill property surrounded by residential and office uses. The site is <br />relatively flat. Grading will be limited to creating the building pads and providing <br />proper drainage of the site, but such grading would be minor. The new units are <br />generally at the same elevation as the existing homes on the adjacent lots. The <br />proposed units have been sited to minimize impacts on surrounding neighbors and <br />have been designed to reduce their mass and not overpower the site. Therefore, <br />this finding can be made. <br /> <br />4. Grading in conjunction with the proposed development plan takes into <br />account environmental characteristics and is designed in keeping with the <br />best engineering practices to avoid erosion, slides, or flooding to have as <br />minimal an effect upon the environment as possible. <br /> <br />The lot is relatively flat and the applicants are proposing to generally maintain the <br />existing grades on the property. Grading has been minimized below the <br />California black walnut tree to reduce impacts to this tree. Erosion control and <br />dust suppression measures will be documented in the building permit plans and <br />will be administered by the City's Building and Public Works Departments. <br />According to the United States Federal Emergency Management Agency Flood <br />Hazard maps, no portion of the site is located in a flood hazard zone. Therefore, <br />this finding can be made. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.