PC-2004-29 - Laserfiche WebLink

PLANNING COMMISSION CITY OF PLEASANTON ALAMEDA COUNTY, CALIFORNIA RESOLUTION NO. PC-2004-29 RESOLUTION RECOMMENDING APPROVAL OF THE APPLICA nON OF REGIS LACHANCE FOR PUD REZONING AND DEVELOPMENT PLAN APPROVAL, AS FILED UNDER CASE PUD-28 WHEREAS, Regis Lachance has applied to rezone the approximately 12,400-square-foot parcel at 1072 Division Street (northwest corner of Fair and Division Streets) from the R-1-6,500 (Single-Family Residential) Zoning District to the PUD-MDR (Planned Unit Development - Medium Density Residential) Zoning District and for PUD development plan approval to construct two new single-family detached homes measuring approximately 1,200 square feet and 2,557 square feet on two lots measuring approximately 4,259 square feet and 8,141 square feet, respectively; and WHEREAS, at its duly noticed public hearing of April 28, 2004, the Planning Commission considered all public testimony, relevant exhibits, and recommendations of the City staff concerning this application; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission recommended approval of the negative declaration prepared for this project; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission determined that the proposed rezoning is appropriate for the site; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission made the following findings for the PUD development plan: I. The plan is in the best interests of the public health, safety, and general welfare. The proposed project, as conditioned, meets all applicable City standards concerning public health, safety, and welfare (e.g., adequate emergency vehicle access, within a five-minute response time zone for fire service, not within a geologic or flood hazard zone, not on a steep slope, etc.). Adequate storm drain, sanitary sewer, and water service utilities are either now present or would be required to be installed by project developers to serve the new dwellings and accessory structures. The project will not generate volumes oftraffic that cannot be accommodated by existing City streets and intersections in the area. The structures would be designed to meet the requirements of the Uniform Building Code and other applicable City codes. The proposed development is compatible with the adjacent uses and would be consistent with the existing scale and character of the area. Therefore, the proposed PUD development plan is in the best interests ofthe public health, safety, and general welfare, and this finding can be made.