Laserfiche WebLink
- of the proposed signage mocked up on the window. He described the process used to <br />determine 25-percent coverage of the window and noted that they ensured the signage <br />would meet that limit. <br />THE PUBLIC HEARING WAS CLOSED. <br />In response to an inquiry by Chairperson Roberts regarding the difference in Code <br />requirements for temporary and permanent signage, Ms. Kline confirmed that the same <br />process would be followed. She added that the Commission may make the signage <br />temporary by allowing it for a certain period of time. <br />Commissioner Fox noted that she had counted 102 letters on the sign and would like to <br />ensure that a business taking over a building may work with the City to revise a <br />monument sign. She understood the need for the business owner to publicize other <br />services than is appazent by the business name. She did not believe 1021etters were <br />appropriate for window signage and suggested that the business work with the City to <br />improve its monument sign. She would not be able to support the motion in its entirety. <br />Commissioner Blank expressed concern about approving a permanent installation, <br />particulazly before the Commission considered potential rules and regulations for window <br />signage. <br />_ Chairperson Roberts noted that she would prefer fewer letters and believed that if the <br />signage would be up on a permanent basis, that number of letters would be inappropriate. <br />She was willing to allow the business to get off the ground with that signage for <br />120 days. She noted that vinyl lettering could become permanent. <br />Commissioner Roberts moved to approve PSDR-218 as conditioned in the staff <br />report. <br />There was no second. <br />Commissioner Fox moved to approve PSDR-218, as conditioned in the staff report, <br />with the modification that the applicant choose and display only two of the three <br />sign components. <br />Commissioner Roberts seconded the motion. <br />ROLL CALL VOTE <br />AYES: Commissioners Blank, Fox, and Roberts. <br />NOES: None. <br />ABSTAIN: None. <br />RECUSED: None. <br />ABSENT: Commissioners Arkin and Maas. <br />Resolution No. PC-2004-68 was entered and adopted as motioned. <br />PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES, December 8, 2004 Page 8 of 19 <br />