My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
PC 111004
City of Pleasanton
>
BOARDS AND COMMISSIONS
>
PLANNING
>
MINUTES
>
2000-2009
>
2004
>
PC 111004
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/14/2017 9:46:55 AM
Creation date
3/16/2005 1:31:11 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CITY CLERK
CITY CLERK - TYPE
MINUTES
DOCUMENT DATE
11/10/2004
DOCUMENT NAME
PC 111004
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
14
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
_ wanted to drafr a memo of understanding where Granite would be given time to move when the <br />construction of Neal School commenced sskeal-sEer~s." <br />The minutes were approved as corrected. <br />3. MEETING OPEN FOR ANY MEMBER OF THE AUDIENCE TO ADDRESS <br />THE PLANNING COMMISSION ON ANY ITEM WHICH IS NOT ALREADY <br />ON THE AGENDA. <br />Vanessa Kawaihu, 871 Sycamore, addressed the Happy Valley Specific Plan and noted that the <br />County-approved development at 255 Happy Valley had been available for inspection. She <br />noted that the site was visible from the freeway and from Foothill Road. She had learned from <br />City residents who lived across the street that the developer had made an application for <br />rezoning. She spoke with a County planner who confirmed that the application had been <br />submitted and would be heard on December 20, 2004. The developer requested that two of the <br />parcels be divided into nine pazcels for an additional seven units. She noted that under the <br />Happy Valley Specific Plan and the location of the urban growth boundary line, this 51-acre <br />parcel was allowed approximately five new houses. The County gave the developer all nine <br />houses, in addition to the existing house and the caretaker house. She noted that this would total <br />17 new units. She asked the Commission to keep the City neighbors informed of this <br />development. <br />_ Chairperson Roberts advised that because of the asphalt batch plant issue, the County had <br />become more sensitive to noticing City residents. <br />Mr. Pavan advised that he would discuss this item with Ms. Eisenwinter and Mr. Iserson. <br />Ms. Nerland stated that the City has opposed the rezoning change and that the new sanitation <br />system was being installed because the City refused to give them a sewer connection; the plan <br />was not in conformance with the City plans for that area. The County has jurisdiction and the <br />ultimate say over the site. <br />Mr. Pavan advised that staff would provide afollow-up report at the December 8, 2004 meeting. <br />4. REVISIONS AND OMISSIONS TO THE AGENDA <br />There were none. <br />5. MATTERS CONTINUED FOR DECISION <br />a. PDR-357 Alexandro Garcia, Blue A¢ave <br />Application for design review approval to allow a 263-square-foot addition, an extension <br />to the front porch, and modifications to the front-yard outdoor dining area for the existing <br />building located at 625 Main Street. Zoning for the property is C-C (Central <br />Commercial)/Downtown Revitalization District. <br />PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES, November 10, 2004 Page 2 of 14 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.