Laserfiche WebLink
THE PUBLIC HEARING WAS CLOSED. <br />Commissioner Maas moved to approve PDR-377 (with the revised "weather vane" - <br />style cross and no columbarium) as conditioned in the staff report, with the <br />modification that the applicant install the landscaping on the northwest corner of <br />the project site, the area closest to the Ponderosa Homes' project's planned <br />single-family residences, at the time of the Phase I construction of the sanctuary. <br />Commissioner Arkin seconded the motion. <br />ROLL CALL VOTE: <br />AYES: Commissioners Arkin, Fox, Maas, and Roberts. <br />NOES: None. <br />ABSTAIN: None. <br />RECUSED: None. <br />ABSENT: Commissioner Sullivan. <br />Resolution No. PC-2004-63 was entered and adopted as motioned. <br />Commissioner Fox inquired whether the church landscaping plans could be posted in the <br />Ponderosa sales office to ensure that the residents from Madsen Court have an attachment <br />to their disclosures. <br />Commissioner Arkin noted that the City must approve the disclosures. <br />In response to an inquiry by Ms. Nerland, Ms. Hardy replied that Ponderosa would agree <br />to that suggestion. Ms. Nerland clarified the different kinds of disclosures, including <br />those required through PUD approval processes. At Commissioner Maas's request, she <br />stated that staff would work with Ponderosa Homes to review ways to disclose church <br />plans to new residents. <br />The Planning Commission recessed for a break at 8:16 p.m. <br />Chairperson Roberts reconvened the meeting at 8:26 p.m. <br />b. PDR-357, Alexandre Garcia. Blue A¢ave <br />Application for design review approval to allow a 263-square-foot addition, an <br />extension to the front porch, and modifications to the front-yard outdoor dining <br />area for the existing building located at 625 Main Street. Zoning for the property <br />is C-C (Central Commercial)/Downtown Revitalization District. <br />Ms. Kline presented the staff report and described the proposed project. While the <br />lighting would be relatively low intensity, staff expressed concern about the quantity of <br />both the fence-mounted and post-mounted lighting fixtures and suggested that the <br />Commission may wish to discuss it further with the applicant. Staff reviewed the project <br />-- in accordance with the Downtown Specific Plan, the Downtown Design Guidelines, as <br />PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES, October 27, 2004 Page 6 of 12 <br />