PC 090804 - Laserfiche WebLink

_ Commissioner Roberts moved to make the finding that the proposed project would not have a significant environmental impact and to recommend approval of the Negative Declaration. Commissioner Maas seconded the motion. ROLL CALL VOTE AYES: Commissioners Maas and Roberts. NOES: Commissioners Fox and Sullivan. ABSTAIN: None. RECUSED: None. ABSENT: Commissioners Arkin and Kameny. The motion did not carry, and following the procedures for tie votes in the Commissioners Handbook, the item was continued to the next meeting when the full Commission would be present. Ms. Nerland indicated that staff would take care of the minor posting and noticing for the matter at the next meeting. Chairperson Roberts advised that Commissioner Maas wished to discuss the hours of operation Ms. Nerland suggested that the Commission re-open the public hearing. THE PUBLIC HEARING WAS RE-OPENED. Commissioner Fox believed that if a new staff report was produced, then the item should be re-noticed. Mr. Iserson suggested that the discussion be terminated at this point, to be resumed at the next meeting. Commissioner Fox requested that some language be included in the staff report to describe the extent to which staff believes the traffic impact was underestimated. Mr. Knowles advised that when he added up the numbers, the double movements were assumed. He noted that page 35 of the traffic report provided those estimates. Commissioner Fox requested further clarification on this issue. Chairperson Roberts suggested that Mr. Swift provide clarification on the traffic paragraph on page 12 of the staff report. The public hearing was continued to the September 22, 2004 Planning Commission meeting. PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES September 8, 2004 Page 10 of 14