My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
PC 082504
City of Pleasanton
>
BOARDS AND COMMISSIONS
>
PLANNING
>
MINUTES
>
2000-2009
>
2004
>
PC 082504
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/14/2017 9:46:16 AM
Creation date
3/16/2005 1:21:13 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CITY CLERK
CITY CLERK - TYPE
MINUTES
DOCUMENT DATE
8/25/2004
DOCUMENT NAME
PC 082504
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
9
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
Mr. Iserson advised that the applicant would construct a turnaround on Lot 2 for the safe <br />exit of traffic to Sycamore Creek Way. He drew the Commission's attention to a staff <br />memo submitted before the meeting, which recommended additional conditions of <br />approval: <br />1. The custom home on Lot I would have plans for an on-site driveway, as well as <br />for a turnaround; and <br />2. The design guidelines in terms of FARs and setbacks would restrict the FAR for <br />Lots 1 and 2 to 25 percent of the respective lot areas. The maximum house size <br />on Lot 3 would not exceed 5000 square feet, excluding 600 square feet of garage <br />area. The minimum side yard setback for principal structures on Lot 3 shall be <br />ten feet, with a minimum 25 feet total for both sideyard setbacks. <br />Staff generally agreed with the development standards and setbacks proposed by the <br />applicant. He noted that the walnut trees on the site were in generally poor condition, and <br />an oak tree had been preserved by the Halkers; guidelines were established to further <br />preserve that tree. In addition, a tree report would be required for the removal of any of <br />the walnut trees if a custom home were to be presented for design review approval. A <br />condition was added requiring the future lot owners to submit a checklist for the green <br />point rating system, which was consistent with the Planning Commission's previous <br />approvals. Staff believed that there was justification for the third lot and that it would be <br />compatible with the area. Staff believed the development plan was well-designed and <br />recommended approval of the Specific Plan amendment and the PUD modification to the <br />City Council. <br />A discussion of the setback requirements and interaction between future neighbors <br />ensued. <br />THE PUBLIC HEARING WAS OPENED. <br />Peter MacDonald, representing the applicants, stated that they supported staff's <br />recommendation as well as the additional amendments to the design guidelines. He noted <br />that Ohana Place was entirely contained on the Moreira property. He noted that the <br />Hafkers planned to sell the house on Lot 3 and build their custom home on Lot 1. An <br />agreement was reached that would allow the Hatkers and Moreiras to share the road <br />costs; the 7,000-square-foot barn on Lot 2 would be removed, a proposal that was <br />well-received by the neighborhood. He noted that Mr. Russ Moreira reiterated his <br />support of this application. He believed that the property was in substantial compliance <br />with the gross density standard. <br />THE PUBLIC HEARING WAS CLOSED. <br />PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES August 25, 2004 Page 3 of 9 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.