My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
PC 062304
City of Pleasanton
>
BOARDS AND COMMISSIONS
>
PLANNING
>
MINUTES
>
2000-2009
>
2004
>
PC 062304
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/14/2017 9:45:41 AM
Creation date
3/16/2005 1:13:05 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CITY CLERK
CITY CLERK - TYPE
MINUTES
DOCUMENT DATE
6/23/2004
DOCUMENT NAME
PC 062304
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
15
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
d. PDR-316. Mario Saavedra <br />Workshop to review and provide comments on a proposal to demolish the existing <br />building at 347 Division Street and to construct an approximately 3,252-square- foot <br />building. Zoning for the property is CC (Central Commercial) Downtown Revitalization <br />District. <br />Commissioner Kameny advised that he was along-time client of the applicant and had <br />developed a personal and business relationship with him. He recused himself from this item and <br />left the dais. <br />Commissioner Fox took Commissioner Kameny's place on the dais <br />Mr. Otto summazized the staff report; staff sought the Commission's assessment of the <br />appropriateness of the azchitectural style and whether the project should be peer-reviewed by the <br />City' consulting architect. He described the proposed use and noted that the proposed floor area <br />ratio was 57 percent. Because the FAR did not exceed 80 percent, the project was not required <br />to provide any off-street pazking due to its location within the pazking assessment district. He <br />described and displayed the proposed colors and materials of the project. <br />THE PUBLIC HEARING WAS OPENED. <br />Mark Stoklosa, project azchitect, noted that he would be available to answer questions. <br />In response to an inquiry by Commissioner Maas regazding the addition of a window in the east <br />elevation of the front entry wall, Mr. Stoklosa noted that it would be a small window. He noted <br />that other buildings that he has designed were very compatible with the Downtown azchitecture <br />and that enhanced the Downtown character. He added that as a licensed azchitect, he did not <br />believe it was necessary to subject his designs to peer review. <br />In response to an inquiry by Commissioner Maas regazding flexibility in the tan color, <br />Mr. Stoklosa noted that he wished to use more of an adobe color and added that he would be <br />flexible in color selection. <br />Commissioner Maas agreed with Mr. Stoklosa's opinion regazding the peer review for this <br />project. <br />Mario Saavedra, building owner, noted that he and his wife wished to create an attractive <br />building for the Downtown. <br />THE PUBLIC HEARING WAS CLOSED. <br />Commissioner Arkin noted that the architecture bothered him a great deal in this location. <br />Chairperson Roberts agreed with Commissioner Arkin's assessment and added that while some <br />elements may be appropriate, some of the building angles may not weaz well over the long term. <br />PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES June 23, 2004 Page 9 of IS <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.