PC 060904 - Laserfiche WebLink

In response to an inquiry by Chairperson Roberts, Mr. Iserson stated that the house designs would be addressed at the staff level when the PUDs were submitted. Chairperson Roberts noted that the designs were highly environmentally sensitive and believed that the Commission should see them. Commissioner Kameny noted that he trusted staff s judgment regarding house designs. Commissioner Sullivan noted that he could not make the General Plan finding and did not believe that the ten-foot high retaining walls on Lots 9, 10, 11, 13, and 14 would be approved today. He did not believe those lots were consistent with the present General Plan. Commissioner Fox understood Commissioner Sullivan's concerns but believed that the neighbors on those lots supported the retaining walls. Commissioner Kameny moved to make the findings for the subdivision map as listed on the staff report and June 9, 2004 staff memorandum and to approve Vesting Tentative Subdivision Map 5904, subject to the conditions of approval as listed on Exhibit B of the staff report, with the addition of a condition that the house designs come before the Planning Commission for review and approval. Commissioner Fox seconded the motion. ROLL CALL VOTE AYES: Commissioners Fox, Kameny, Maas, and Roberts. NOES: Commissioner Sullivan. ABSTAIN: None. ABSENT: Commissioner Arkin. Resolution No. PC-2004-39 was entered and adopted as motioned. The Planning Commission recessed for a break at 9:23 p.m. Chairperson Roberts reconvened the meeting at 9:28 p.m. e. Input Re¢ardina the Bernal Property Desien Competition Finalists' Submitta-s Wayne Rasmussen summazized the staff report and noted that a professional design competition was held concurrent with an amateur competition. He noted that William Liskamm, a San Francisco-based azchitect and environmental planner, was appointed to coordinate the design competition. He noted that there were submissions from across the country and overseas. He described the parameters of the competition and noted that the comments on the designs were attached to the staff report. He noted that the jury - narrowed the field of professional designs from 24 submittals to 5 finalist, whose designs PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES June 9, 2004 Page 10 of 19