My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
PC 022504
City of Pleasanton
>
BOARDS AND COMMISSIONS
>
PLANNING
>
MINUTES
>
2000-2009
>
2004
>
PC 022504
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/14/2017 9:43:45 AM
Creation date
3/16/2005 12:43:08 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CITY CLERK
CITY CLERK - TYPE
MINUTES
DOCUMENT DATE
2/25/2004
DOCUMENT NAME
PC 022504
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
19
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
- that the Planning Commission and the City Council should have the same set of <br />information to reach their decisions. <br />Chairperson Roberts believed that this was an unusual case. <br />Mr. Iserson advised that the City Council did receive the Planning Commission staff <br />reports in their packet and added that not every detail of the Commission report was in <br />the Council staff report. He noted that Council received more of a summary report. <br />Chairperson Roberts recalled a former Commissioner who frequently spoke before the <br />Council who told her that he never addressed the Council on an issue that he had taken a <br />vote on. <br />Commissioner Sullivan noted that he did not agree with that stance and did not believe he <br />should obtain anyone's permission to speak before the City Council. He stated that he <br />would exercise his First Amendment rights; however, he would represent himself as an <br />individual citizen or Commissioner, but not as a spokesperson for the Commission. <br />Commissioner Fox agreed with Commissioner Sullivan's statements and did not wish to <br />be constrained against speaking at a City Council meeting. She stated that she would not <br />represent herself as speaking for the Commission as a whole. <br />_-. February 19 2004 General Plan Undate Meetin¢ <br />Commissioner Maas noted that she felt uncomfortable when Commissioner Sullivan <br />criticized Brian Swift for giving a lengthy presentation of the staff report. She regretted <br />not discussing the issue at that time and wanted it known that she respected him as the <br />Director of Planning. She noted that it was important for the Commissioners to be aware <br />of important items. <br />Commissioner Sullivan noted that it was not his intent to critique the Planning Director, <br />but that he was concerned that the many people in the audience would not be able to <br />speak within the rigidtwo-hour time limit. He noted that Mr. Swift made a good <br />presentation with valuable information, but believed that the presentation should be <br />tailored to accommodate time constraints and to allow public participation. <br />Commissioner Maas noted that may have been an unusual circumstance and could not <br />recall another meeting where a time limit had been imposed. <br />Commissioner Arkin noted that a long staff report was difficult for the public because <br />they wanted to make their comments. He did not believe that they should wait for a long <br />time before they could speak. <br />Commissioner Sullivan suggested that the public comments should be heard early in the <br />meeting. <br />PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES February 25, 2004 Page 17 of 19 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.