My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
SR 05:080
City of Pleasanton
>
CITY CLERK
>
AGENDA PACKETS
>
2005
>
SR 05:080
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/31/2005 9:48:12 AM
Creation date
3/10/2005 1:13:19 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CITY CLERK
CITY CLERK - TYPE
STAFF REPORTS
DOCUMENT DATE
4/5/2005
DESTRUCT DATE
15 Y
DOCUMENT NO
SR 05:080
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
44
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
was interested in cont/nu/ng th/s item another two weeks, staffcould still continue to <br />make payments; however, beyond that it becomes problematic, as the $4 million dollars <br />needs to be in an account to pay the contractor. <br /> <br /> Ms. Hosterman seemed to recall that Council saw a number of change orders not <br />too long ago. She asked if Council had seen most of the change orders, and wondered if <br />there were a substantial number of change orders in addition to what it had already seen. <br /> <br /> Mayor Pico seemed to recall that it had been a while since Council had reviewed <br />the change orders. <br /> <br /> Mr. Wilson mentioned that change orders continue to accrue as the project moves <br />along. He believed there were a significant number of change orders that Council had not <br />reviewed. <br /> <br /> Ms. Host~m~an asked if the City was required to accept the lowest bidder.on any <br />public building projects. <br /> <br /> Mr. Wilson confirmed that the City is required to choose the lowest, responsible, <br />qualified bidder. He noted that Ferma Construction did meet that criteria when it was <br />awarded the bid for the construction of the Callippe Preserve Golf Course. He no'ed that <br />awarding a contract to the lowest, responsible, qualified bidder does not affect the <br />number of change orders. He pointed out the complexity of this project, which entailed <br />several large sets of plans. With a project this size, and due to the fact that the City has <br />not been in the business of constructing golf courses, a number of corrections needed to <br />be made to the plans. Staff also found some conditions in the field that were not expected <br />when the golf course was originally laid out. He pointed out that staffhas resolved a <br />number of the problems through the change orders. '. <br /> <br /> Ms. McKeehan wanted Council to think about what the continuance of this item <br /> would do in actuality <br /> <br /> Ms. Ayala mentioned that she might not want to give permission to the Public <br /> Works Director to approve additional change orders. <br /> <br /> Ms. McKeehan noted that after reviewing the change orders, Council still had the <br /> option of giving the Public Works Director permission to sign the unpaid change orders <br /> even if it was det~mdned that Council had an issue. <br /> <br /> Ms. Ayala believed Council was also authorizing the Public Works Director to <br /> sign the change orders. <br /> <br /> Ms. McKeehan confirmed that she was correct. In order to keep the project <br /> moving along, she mentioned that another possibility would be that staff could provide <br /> the change orders to Council, and if Council had a concern with any of the unpaid change <br /> orders, staffwould not make payment until it had a chance to discuss it with Council. <br /> <br /> Pleasanton City Council 10 01/20/04 <br /> Minutes <br /> <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.