Laserfiche WebLink
Item 6b <br />PUD-99-02~ Hoss and Mo[gan Bozorgzad <br />Application for Planned Unit Development (PUD) plan approval for a four-lot <br />residential development with lots ranging in size from 19~320 sq. ft. to 34~865 sq. ft" <br />includin~ design ~,uideline aooroval for the future homes~ on a 2.5+ acre parcel <br />located at 488 Sycamore Road. (SR 99:277) <br /> <br />Brian Swirl presented the staff report. <br /> <br /> Ms. Michelotti asked if the Planning Commission adopted the recommended <br />setbacks. <br /> <br />Mr. Swirl said yes. <br /> <br /> Mr. Tarver referred to Condition #25 regarding recording of a final map within <br />two years of PUD approval. He thought previous conditions were dependent on <br />receiving growth management allocation within two years. He assumed the condition <br />was changed because that is no longer a problem with the first-come, first-served growth <br />management process. But he felt if the developer does not take out permits when they <br />are allowed to, it would become a problem <br /> <br /> Mr. Swirl said the condition was modified with regard to the first-come, first- <br />served projects. The structure of the growth management program today for these kinds <br />of projects would potentially hold up any project, with or without final map approval. <br /> <br /> Mr. Tarver felt the intent was to prevent having a backlog and he believed that <br />with the condition so stated, it is up to the applicants to decide, not the city to decide, <br />when the permits are taken out. Although the City controls how many permits are <br />allocated to first-come, first-served projects, he felt it could create a pressure on that <br />category, when it was not anticipated that it should. He wanted further discussion on this <br />by the Council. He also inquired about flood control. He assumed it would not <br />significantly increase the arroyo problems or create a problem that the City cannot <br />handle. <br /> <br /> Mr. Swirl said the Greenbriar project and the entire North Sycamore Specific Plan <br />has designed the storm drainage plan for this particular area. The creek that crosses this <br />property takes only a small portion of the water. Most of the water from Sycamore Creek <br />nms down a pipe that is installed in Sycamore Road and discharges on the Kaiser <br />property. This channel has only a low flow of water. The upstream portion of this <br />channel is designed with an overflow bank and retention pond basin in conjunction with <br />the Fish and Game Department and the Regional Water Quality Control Board. This <br />property ultimately discharges into the portion of the Arroyo downstream of the <br />constriction point near the Castlewood Country Club. <br /> <br />Excerpt from the City Council Meeting Minutes of 9/20/99 1 <br />Page 1 <br /> <br /> <br />