SR 05:069 - Laserfiche WebLink

The project developer would implement the Planning Commission's recommendations pertaining to the resolution of the issues raised by Mary and Anne Greene at the public hearing: Work out the details and provide solutions pertaining to runoff, flooding, and retaining walls with the Greenes, and show these details/solutions on the preliminary grading plan submitted ~vith the tentative parcel map. · Install open mesh fencing along the common east/west property lines between the sub- ject property and the Greenes' property. Disclose to the future buyers of the parcels covered by this development plan the agri- cultural uses on the Greenes' property, including livestock grazing, keeping of live- stock, storage and use of agricultural machinery and equipment, etc. Consult with the Greenes and other neighbors prior to preparing the site specific build- ing designs to address their concerns pertaining to privacy/view issues, lower building heights, etc. A concern expressed by Greenes at the Planning Commission public regarding the loca- tion of the common property line that they share with the project site is discussed in greater detail in the "PLANNING COMMISSION PUBLIC HEARING" section of the City Council staff report. It is addressed with a new staff recommended condition of ap- proval requiring a field survey of the property line with the parcel map application. A complete discussion of the proposed project's site design, Sycamore Creek, green building measures, fencing, landscaping and existing trees, growth management allocations, and grad- lng/urban stormwater runoff is contained in the "Site Design';' "Sycamore Creek"; "Green Building Measures"; "Fencing';' "Landscaping and Existing Trees"; "Growth Management Allocations"; and "Grading/Urban Storrnwater RunofJ°' sections of the attached Planning Com- mission staff report. Specific Plan Amendment PSP-08 is a proposed amendment of the North Sycamore Specific Plan to delete the pedestrian sidewalk between Sycamore Terrace and San Carlos Way from the Specific Plan and therefore, from the proposed project. Although the applicant has incorporated the pedestrian sidewalk in the design of the proposed development plan and would construct the sidewalk following the City's direction, concerns and opposition to the sidewalk have been expressed to staff from ad- joining and nearby neighbors and was a major topic of discussion at the Planning Commission's public hearing on the item. As was discussed in the ANALYSIS section of the attached Planning SR 05.-069 Page 4 of 15