My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
SR 05:070
City of Pleasanton
>
CITY CLERK
>
AGENDA PACKETS
>
2005
>
SR 05:070
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/4/2005 10:28:38 AM
Creation date
3/4/2005 9:59:01 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CITY CLERK
CITY CLERK - TYPE
STAFF REPORTS
DOCUMENT DATE
3/8/2005
DESTRUCT DATE
15 YAE
DOCUMENT NO
SR 05:070
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
60
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
· New traffic signals at intersections meeting signal warrants included in future <br /> CIP funding years. <br /> <br />In a sense, then, the "Existing Plus Approved" intersection operational descriptors may be <br />conservative in that additional intersection modifications may well accompany the added growth <br />being projected, thus improving the LOS at certain intersections. <br /> <br />Regional Growth <br /> <br />The "Existing Plus Approved" model run used projected 2010 levels of region-wide growth <br />rather than "buildout" projections since this model run was originally done as a mid-term <br />projection. The "Baseline Report" shows the assumed level of regional growth. At 2010, East <br />Dublin, Dougherty Valley, and Livermore are far short of their buildout (General Plan) levels of <br />intensity. Area development impacts not only the direct utilization of Pleasanton's 1-580 <br />interchanges it shares with Dublin/Dougherty Valley traffic, but also the models' balancing of <br />home-to-work/shopping trips and, thus, indirectly, the distribution of trips in Pleasanton. If the <br />"Existing Plus Approved" land use scenario were modeled with "Buildout" regional <br />development, the local distribution of trips and cut-through trips would be different, and, thus, it <br />is likely some intersection LOS would be different. Freeway congestion is projected to be worse <br />on both 1-580 and 1-680, and, thus, cut-through traffic routes are impacted when local street <br />capacity is available. <br /> <br />Proiected Intersection Operation <br /> <br />Tables 7 and 8 show the projected LOS at all 127 intersections in the AM and PM peak hours, <br />respectively. As for "Existing," individual intersection leg delay is included as well as overall <br />delay. The number of intersections with a peak-hour operation at LOS E/F is projected to <br />increase from 12 to 33. The change in peak-hour LOS at major intersections is shown <br />graphically on Figures 5 and 6. <br /> <br />Overall delay also significantly increases throughout much of the City. LOS A intersections <br />decrease from 45 percent and 35 percent of total intersections to 23 percent and 17 percent (AM <br />and PM, respectively). LOS C or better intersections are reduced from 87 percent to 70 percent <br />of total AM and PM intersections. In addition, delay within individual service levels also <br />increases, contributing to overall increase in delay. <br /> <br />SR 05:070 <br />Page 8 <br /> <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.