Laserfiche WebLink
<br />. <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />The proposed project either meets or exceeds all of the Hacienda Business Park guidelines. The <br />setback along Inglewood is a little less than the standard setback of 104 feet, however, the guidelines <br />do provide for variation and increases in the setback at other locations to compensate. This has been <br />achieved with this design. <br /> <br />A total of 349 parking spaces are proposed that will surround the building. This amount exceeds the <br />requirements. Two new driveways will be constructed to service the project. An existing driveway <br />will also be used to service the site. <br /> <br />Staff believes the architecture is attractive and matches the previously-built buildings. Staff feels the <br />project, as conditioned, will meet all the Hacienda Business Park guidelines and recommends <br />approval of this application. <br /> <br />PUBLIC HEARING WAS OPENED <br /> <br />Al Chamarro, project architect, noted that the applicants do not have any exceptions to the conditions <br />of approval. <br /> <br />Commissioner McGuirk inquired about the preferential parking. Me. Chamarro stated it is a <br />requirement of Hacienda Business Park and the preferential parking is for the carpool and vanpool <br />vans. <br /> <br />Commissioner McGuirk inquired of staff if 5% handicapped parking is standard. Staff indicated it <br />was and if for some reason a business/company needed more handicapped spaces, hopefully the <br />employer would be responsive to the need. <br /> <br />PUBLIC HEARING WAS CLOSED <br /> <br />Commissioner Lutz motioned, seconded by Commissioner McGuirk, approving Case PUD-81- <br />30-66D, subject to the conditions listed in Exhibit B. <br /> <br />ROLL CALL VOTE <br /> <br />AYES: <br />NOES: <br />ABSENT: <br />ABSTAIN: <br /> <br />Commissioners Cooper, Dove, Lutz, McGuirk and Chairwoman Barker <br />None <br />Commissioner Wright <br />None <br /> <br />Resolution No. PC 96-62 was entered approving Case PUD-81-30-66D, as motioned. <br /> <br />Planning Commission Minutes <br /> <br />Page 8 <br /> <br />August 28, 1996 <br />