PC 04/24/96 - Laserfiche WebLink

. . . the eviction process. The Commission could also continue the application to gather further information. Mr. Arakorpi stated the tenants are almost totally moved out, with only a few l\ni..l~~ I~ml\ining in the unit. Commissioner Wright believes that as a land use criteria, the applicants have met all the requirements. The Commissioners are concerned about the amount of traffic generated by the second unit and the impact on the neighborhood. Mr. Beougher advised that the past history of the tenants cannot be held against this application at this time. Commissioner Barker and Chairman Lutz are in favor of continuing the application. Commissioner Barker motioned to continue Case UP-94-24 until May 8, 1996, on the basis to ("md out if the owner is actually leasing the property. The motion died for lack of a second. Mr. Beougher advised that with co-owners, they both own the property 100 percent and either one can lease the property without approval of the other. Commissioner Wright motioned approving Case UP-94-24, subject to the conditions listed in Exhibit B, with the following modification: Conditions 2 and 9: Staff to add tenant eviction along with the 30 day time period. The motion died for lack of a second. Mr. Beougher advised the Commission could continue the application if they had a sufficient basis for doing so. Commissioner Wright restated his motion: Commissioner Wright motioned, seconded by Commissioner McGuirk, making the Conditional Use Permit findings and approving Case UP-94-24, subject to the conditions of approval in Exhibit B, with the following modifications: Conditions 2 and 9: Change "thirty (30) days from the date of project approval" to "thirty (30) days and/or tenant eviction, whichever is greater." ROLL CALL VOTE AYES: NOES: ABSENT: ABSTAIN: Commissioners Hovingh, McGuirk, Wright and Chairman Lutz Commissioner Barker None None Resolution No. PC 96-24 was entered approving Case UP-94-24, as motioned, Planning Commission Minutes Page 6 AprU 24, 19%