PC 04/24/96 - Laserfiche WebLink

. . . In response to Commissioner McGuirk, the six inch curb is needed to keep cars out of landscaping and to help with draittage. Mr. Iserson felt some flexibility could be used to remove curbing in some locations. PUBLIC HEARING WAS CLOSED Commissioner Hovingh stated he supports the project and considers it a very nice architectural project. Commissioner Barker also concurred that she likes the project. Commissioner Wright concurs with the applicant's request for a three foot setback but they must accommodate the utility services. He also agrees to the deletion of the evergreen trees. Commissioner Wright would like staff to work with the applicant in the placement of the six inch curbing. He again noted that he would like some sealer placed on the concrete in the driveways and visitor parking. Commissioner McGuirk feels the project is good looking and will support it. Commissioner Barker motioned, seconded by Commissioner Wright, recommending approval of the draft Negative Declaration. ROLL CALL VOTE AYES: NOES: ABSENT: ABSTAIN: Commissioners Barker, Hovingh, McGuirk, Wright and Chairman Lutz None None None Resolution No. PC 96-26 was entered adopting the draft Negative Declaration, as motioned. Commissioner Barker motioned, seconded by Commissioner McGuirk, finding the PUD rezoning and development plan are consistent with the General Plan and purposes of the PUD ordinance and recommending approval of Case PUD-96-03 for PUD rezoning and development plan approval, subject to the conditions listed in Exhibit B, with the following modifications: Condition 9B: Have a minimum three foot setback and three foot fence, subject to accommodating service utilities, Condition 15: Delete. Condition 17B: Delete. Condition 19: Work with staff in the placement of six inch curbs. PlannIng Commission Minute. Page 11 April 24, 1996