My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
PC 11/19/97
City of Pleasanton
>
BOARDS AND COMMISSIONS
>
PLANNING
>
MINUTES
>
1990-1999
>
1997
>
PC 11/19/97
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/29/2013 1:02:43 PM
Creation date
2/9/2005 1:57:54 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CITY CLERK
CITY CLERK - TYPE
MINUTES
DOCUMENT DATE
11/19/1997
DOCUMENT NAME
PC 11/19/97
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
39
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />. , <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />In response to a question by Commissioner Barker, Mr. Higdon noted that there is a capital <br />. improvements fee for development, but not a traffic impact fee. <br /> <br />Donna Gudaitis, 375 Sycamore Road, Pleasanton, stated that she would never agree to the <br />proposed "A" Street, but she would be willing to compromise if the developer agreed to narrow <br />it by four feet. She reported that the new road would be approximately 30 feet from her <br />daughter's bedroom window and this concerns her. She also stated that if the road were not <br />narrowed, she would be forced to lose a large tree on her property. Additionally, she would <br />prefer to have the road going straight with a stop sign and a left turn allowing access into the <br />development. Commissioner Kumaran confirmed with Ms. Gudaitis that she is in favor of <br />proposal B. <br /> <br />Earl Bach, 446 Sycamore Road, Pleasanton, stated that he is "the sacrificial lamb" in this <br />project. He stated that he supported the NSSP until he recently heard, by accident, of the <br />alternate proposal for "A" Street. He stated that construction of the road would force him and <br />his family out of their home because he does not feel it would be safe to live adjacent to the <br />proposed intersection. He requested that the Commission support the conditions that have <br />previously been approved in the NSSP. <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />Commission Barker asked Mr. Bach whether his home would be moved back if the road goes <br />through his property. He stated that was his understanding until he heard about the new road <br />alignment. In response to another question by Commissioner Barker, he stated that even if the <br />new road alignment took place and his house was moved back, he would still not support the <br />new alignment. He feel that the Greenes would be the only residents to benefit from this <br />proposed new alignment. <br /> <br />Jack Keane, 417 Sycamore Road, Pleasanton, stated that his property is located where the new <br />collector road would veer to the north away from his property. He noted that before purchasing <br />his property, he reviewed the NSSP in detail and that was a factor in his decision to purchase <br />his home. He recently learned of alternative B which would bring a wider, busier road closer <br />to his home. He is very concerned for his young children's safety because of the increased <br />traffic. He noted that he is in support of narrowing the road by at least four feet and is <br />adamantly opposed to moving and/or widening Sycamore Road any further south than as is <br />shown in the NSSP and in the application. He urged the Commission to support staff's <br />recommendations and conditions for approval. <br /> <br />John Severini, 433 Sycamore Road, Pleasanton, stated that he became involved in the planning <br />of the NSSP in 1990 when he was searching for a lot to build his home. After learning of the <br />road alignment required by the plan, he purchased a lot on Sycamore Road and built his home. <br />He stated that staff's recommendation of "A" Street is what the NSSP previously adopted. He <br />stated that any neighbor who is affected by this proposal has had many years and many <br />opportunities to voice their opposition. Mr. Severini noted that he recently became aware of <br /> <br />Planning Commission Minutes <br /> <br />Page 10 <br /> <br />November 19, 1997 <br /> <br />. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.