My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
PC 11/19/97
City of Pleasanton
>
BOARDS AND COMMISSIONS
>
PLANNING
>
MINUTES
>
1990-1999
>
1997
>
PC 11/19/97
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/29/2013 1:02:43 PM
Creation date
2/9/2005 1:57:54 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CITY CLERK
CITY CLERK - TYPE
MINUTES
DOCUMENT DATE
11/19/1997
DOCUMENT NAME
PC 11/19/97
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
39
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />. . <br />1 <br /> <br />, <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />Alternate Plan B and that he is adamantly opposed to it. He supports the original Plan A and <br />. asked the Commission to support staff's recommendation. <br /> <br />Joy Macari, 455 Sycamore Road, Pleasanton, stated that she and her family have lived in their <br />home for the pas 29 years. She supported the original "A" Street plan as originally adopted. <br />She, too, has recently learned of Alternate Plan B, and she and her husband are adamantly <br />opposed to it because their driveway would enter Sycamore Road directly in front of one of the <br />stop signs and they feel this would put them in a dangerous situation. They are also concerned <br />that the intersection would have a negative impact on their property value. She asked that the <br />Commission to adopt the road as it was originally proposed. <br /> <br />Marcia Lydiksen, 5795 San Antonio Street, Pleasanton, advised that her home is adjacent to lots <br />12 and 13 of the proposed development. She stated that she met with the Greenbriar <br />representatives last week and, at that time, lot 12 had already been a designated site for a two- <br />story home. She, therefore, is requesting that lot 13 have a one-story house in order to preserve <br />the view and privacy of her home. She noted that although the developer offered to plant trees <br />in her yard to address her privacy concerns, she declined because she already has enough trees <br />strategically placed in order to allow an for an attractive view. Although she is affected by the <br />v-ditch, she has no opinion on the issue. <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />Scott Wade, 5808 San Juan Way, Pleasanton, stated that his home backs the Lydiksen's. He <br />stated that he agreed to the two-story home on lot 12. Although lot 13 was not discussed, he <br />stated that he was led to believe that Ms. Lydiksen was in agreement with the two-story on lot <br />12. He stated that his and the Lydiksen's lot is lower than lots 12 and 13 and he feels that the <br />homes built on those lots will be towering over theirs and will somewhat obstruct their views <br />of the ridges. He asked the Commission to give some thought to his concerns and support <br />staff's recommendations for lots 12 and 13, although he stated he "could live with" a two-story <br />on lot 12. <br /> <br />Keith Kass, 966 Sycamore Road, Pleasanton, advised the Commission that his concern is that <br />the road be moved off of his property and he, therefore, supports staff's condition on this issue. <br />Mr. Kass asked whether the proposed Homeowner's Association would apply to existing <br />residents and Mr. Plucker stated that it does not. <br /> <br />Tom Merschel, New Cities Development Group, 9781 Blue Larkspur Lane, Monterey, advised <br />the Commission that New Cities is developing the property that is adjacent to the east of the <br />Greenbriar property. He stated that since New Cities is a funding developer, they will be <br />responsible for a portion of the up-front costs to complete the construction of "A" Street. He <br />agrees with Greenbriar that "A" Street, as outlined in their finance plan, is correct and <br />equitable. He further noted that he supported the modifications made to condition 11 of staff's <br />recommendation relating to the costs of "A" Street and urged the Commission to support that <br />recommendation. Mr. Merschel also asked the Commission to support Greenbriar's request for <br /> <br />Page 11 <br /> <br />November 19, 1997 <br /> <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />Planning Commission Minutes <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.