My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
PC 11/12/97
City of Pleasanton
>
BOARDS AND COMMISSIONS
>
PLANNING
>
MINUTES
>
1990-1999
>
1997
>
PC 11/12/97
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
10/16/2017 3:54:48 PM
Creation date
2/9/2005 1:46:25 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CITY CLERK
CITY CLERK - TYPE
MINUTES
DOCUMENT DATE
11/12/1997
DOCUMENT NAME
PC 11/12/97
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
16
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />.' <br /> <br />Commissioner Lutz commented that any question relating to guns is always a very highly <br />charged issue. He views the issue as one where the City is being asked to regulate commercial <br />activity, and feels that the sale of firearms is an activity the should be regulated. He noted that <br />the proposed ordinance would allow an FFL dealer up to one full year to establish a business <br />location change, and he believes the start-up costs would be minimal. He stated that if gun shop <br />dealers are currently working with FFL dealers, then it may be possible for a home dealer to <br />establish a business dealership there. With regard to gun shows at the Fairgrounds, he does not <br />believe that this Commission or the City should try to solve the County's problems with the <br />Fairgrounds. Commissioner Lutz also stated that he agrees that guns sales should not occur in <br />public places. He, therefore, supports the ordinance, but believes there should be a separate <br />zoning requirement for the Fairgrounds. <br /> <br />Commissioner Dove noted that the City Council indicated that they are interested in some type <br />of gun control. However, he commented that there have been no complaints against home FFL <br />dealers, and he feels the fact that the Police Chief did not attend the meeting is significant. He <br />further related that anytime ordinances or permit applications came before the Commission <br />relating to home-based businesses such as daycare, swimming lessons, and piano lessons, it was <br />in response to neighborhood complaints. He specifically feels that the FFL dealers present no <br />nuisance problems because there have been no complaints. He therefore, does not support the <br />ordinance. With regard to the fairgrounds issue, he believes that the Commission should vote <br />on that issue and let the County decide whether to comply with the recommendation. <br /> <br />Chair Cooper stated that he is not in support of the ordinance. He noted that the issue before <br />the Commission is not gun ownership, but rather where guns can be sold. He related that <br />automobiles are responsible for more deaths on an annual basis than guns. He further <br />commented that the Fairgrounds supports car shows, street car rallies and that, in his view, cars <br />are weapons. He feels that gun shows at the Fairgrounds represent no more of a threat than <br />store-front gun stores. Chair Cooper shared that he recently attended a gun show at the <br />Fairgrounds, and he found the safety to be good and overall the function was clean and orderly. <br />He agrees with Commissioner Dove that the Commission should vote on the Fairgrounds issue <br />and let the County decide whether to comply with the recommendation. <br /> <br />Chair Cooper believes that home FFL dealers are probably the safest gun owners in the City. <br />He stated that they have a thorough understanding and an awareness of guns and are under strict <br />federal restrictions. He also commented that an FFL dealer with a gun poses no more of a <br />threat than a neighbor who owns a gun. He feels that FFL dealers are not enough of a threat <br />to public safety to be singled out any more than a small mail order or telemarketing business. <br />He, therefore, will not support the ordinance. <br /> <br />A brief discussion was held relating to the exempt and non-exempt status. The Commission also <br />discussed Commissioner Barker's suggestion that problem cases be brought before the <br />Commission so that each case could be reviewed and decided upon individually based upon the <br />severity of the complaint. <br /> <br />Planning Commission Minutes <br /> <br />Page 14 <br /> <br />November 12, 1997 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.