PC 06/11/97 - Laserfiche WebLink

Commissioner Wright commented that he felt the Planning Commission was doing its job by requiring that the modulars look like adjacent buildings. ~ Commissioner Cooper noted that the modulars are temporary and the Overlay District did not prevent them from being installed. He stated that he did not feel they would be losing much by deleting the requirements of the Overlay District. Commissioner Lutz stated that he supports the efforts to streamline the process. In response to Commissioner Kumaran's question, Mr. Iserson confirmed that the Planning Commission will continue to review these items, but that projects will not have to go to the City Council unless they are appealed. A motion was made by Commissioner Lutz, seconded by Commissioner Wright, recommending approval of the draft ordinance, Exhibit "A," as presented in the staff report for Case RZ-97-03. ROLL CALL VOTE AYES: Commissioners Cooper, Kumaran, Lutz, and Wright NOES: Chair Barker ABSENT: None ABSTAIN: None r- Resolution No. PC 97-53 was entered and adopted recommending approval of Case RZ-97-03, as motioned. Chair Barker noted that she voted "no" because the City Council should be part of the approval process for modulars in the Civic Overlay District. b. Caoital Imorovement Prol!I"am Review of the Five-Year (1997-98 through 2001-02) Capital Improvement Program and consideration of conformity with the General Plan. This item was presented at the May 28, 1997, Planning Commission meeting, at which time public testimony was taken. Following discussion of this item the Planning Commission continued the item to this evening's meeting, for the Commission's input and comments. Mr. Bocian advised that the Capital Improvement Program was discussed at the Council's June 5 workshop. In response to Commissioner Cooper's question as to why there was a dramatic reduction in revenues of parks, Mr. Bocian advised that there had been no new development contributing park fees. Commissioner Kumaran stated that he has no concerns with the Capital Improvement Program and feels it follows the General Plan. Commissioner Cooper asked if the flooding problem at Pleasanton Gardens mentioned by Mr. Fielder at the last meeting should be addressed sooner. Mr. Bocian advised that this project was discussed at the Council workshop and that all parties were in agreement as to the scheduling of this project. ~ Planning Commission Minutes Page 14 June 11, 1997