My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
PC 05/14/97
City of Pleasanton
>
BOARDS AND COMMISSIONS
>
PLANNING
>
MINUTES
>
1990-1999
>
1997
>
PC 05/14/97
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
10/16/2017 3:55:52 PM
Creation date
1/26/2005 4:14:14 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CITY CLERK
CITY CLERK - TYPE
MINUTES
DOCUMENT DATE
5/14/1997
DOCUMENT NAME
PC 5/14/97
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
20
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />Commissioner Cooper feels it was ill-considered to put residential in this area because of the <br />interface of residential and commercial. He is sympathetic to the residential concerns, and concurs <br />this is similar to the ELI project and traffic concerns in neighborhoods. Commissioner Cooper is <br />concerned with truck traffic in the neighborhood. He supports Plan 2, but in deference to the <br />applicant, he would support Option 3 which provides for a left in and a right out. <br /> <br />Commissioner Kumaran seems there must be a balance between the interest of the few to the interest <br />of the many. This area is a gateway to Pleasanton from Livermore. To maintain and keep the flow <br />of traffic on Stanley, he is opposed to the left turns in and out. He sympathizes with the residents <br />of Reflections but supports Plan 1. <br /> <br />Commissioner Lutz also supports Plan I being the safest and is consistent with previous planning. <br />Stanley Blvd. traffic flows will only increase in time. Prefers to make the Reflections Drive work <br />with the least impact on California Reflections. <br /> <br />This item was directed back to staff and continued to a future meeting, with the direction to pursue <br />Plan 1. <br /> <br />f. Z-97-58/V-7-03. CSB Construction/Rav's Electrical and Plumbinl! Supplies <br />Application for 1) design review approval to construct an approximately 4,350 square foot <br />storage building to be located behind the existing building at 3730/3732 Stanley Boulevard; and <br />2) a variance from the Municipal Code to allow the proposed storage building to encroach into <br />the required rear yard setback. Zoning for the property is C-S (Service Commercial) District. <br /> <br />~ Mr. Iserson presented the application for design review approval to construct an approximately 4,350 <br />square foot storage building and a variance from the Municipal Code to allow the proposed storage <br />building to encroach into the required rear yard setback. The property is located at 3724-3732 <br />Stanley Blvd. A sign review is also included. The variance being sought is to be able to build the <br />building with a zero foot setback where a 10 foot setback is required. <br /> <br />The subject property is located in an area of mixed land uses of Public Storage facility, single-family <br />homes, and an underdeveloped parcel zoned Agriculture District. <br /> <br />The applicants proposed building a one-story storage building in an area that is currently being used <br />as an outdoor storage area. The applicants wish to provide a weather-proof storage area for storing <br />plumbing and electrical supplies and windows and doors. The building would be a metal building <br />with a TexCoat finish to replicate the stucco finish of the existing building. It would have a mansard <br />roof made out of metal that would have an appearance of concrete tiles as are on the adjacent <br />building. Wood trim would be used as well. <br /> <br />The applicant would like to remove the existing monument sign and construct a new multi-tenant <br />sign. It would be set back five feet from the future realignment of Stanley Blvd. and five feet in <br />from the driveway. It would be a painted plywood sign with five tenant panels, 8'4" tall by 7' in <br />width. The applicant has advised that he would like to externally illuminate the monument sign. <br /> <br />Planning Commission Minutes <br /> <br />Page 17 <br /> <br />May 14, 1997 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.