Laserfiche WebLink
<br />General discussion continued that the Affordable Housing Commission feels the Planning <br />Commission should, and does not understand why the Planning Commission does not, review the <br />interior features including the type of cabinets, door handles, bathroom fixtures, etc. Chair Barker <br />stated that she had informed the Affordable Housing Commission that interior designs were not the <br />purview of the Planning Commission and they might want to pursue the reinstatement of the Design <br />Review Board to address their design issues. That might be a more appropriate forum. Another <br />concern of the Affordable Housing Commission was that there could be a social stigma attached to <br />low-income housing that was distinguishable from the market-rate housing in the same development. <br /> <br />Commissioner Wright inquired about the Safeway parking lot and stated he has reservations about <br />the parking lot configuration. Mr. Iserson stated the parking lot has not been finished, but the <br />parking lot dimensions met Code requirements at the time of approval. Mr. Iserson also commented <br />that Safeway has asked staff if they could modify the parking lot from a 90-degree parking <br />configuration to an angled parking configuration. Staff's concern is that this reconfiguration would <br />mean a significant reduction in parking spaces to below code requirements. Mr. Iserson has <br />concerns about parking lot deficiencies. Also noted was the request by Walgreens to have a drive- <br />through prescription window and the Standard station remodeling. They propose to have a <br />convenience store but not a car wash. <br /> <br />Commissioner Lutz asked if anything could be done about the graffiti on the concrete bridge <br />abutments in the area of Main Street on the Centennial path. The foot bridge crossing the creek at <br />St. John's Place was also discussed. Mr. Beougher and Mr. Higdon advised the recent work was <br />been done without permits. Commissioner Lutz doesn't believe it would survive a heavy rainfall. <br /> <br />Commissioner Dove noted the current traffic situation with the San Ramon In-N-Out Burger and <br />commented that City staff may want to review this with regard to the Pleasanton In-N-Out Burger <br />application. Mr. Higdon stated the Pleasanton location has a better on-site traffic circulation plan <br />than does San Ramon. <br /> <br />Chair Barker questioned about the landscaping of the Vineyard median. Mr. Higdon advised that <br />a contract has been awarded and a Notice to Proceed has been issued. <br /> <br />8. MATTERS FOR COMMISSION'S REVIEW <br /> <br />a. Future Planning Calendar <br />There were none. <br /> <br />b. Actions of the Citv Council <br /> <br />Commissioner Cooper noted the Council's action on the Early Learning Institute's application and <br />the changes they made (access restricted to Stoneridge Drive). <br /> <br />c. Actions of the Zoninl! Administrator <br />There were none. <br /> <br />Page 7 <br /> <br />March 26, 1997 <br /> <br />Planning Commission Minutes <br />