My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
PC 01/08/97
City of Pleasanton
>
BOARDS AND COMMISSIONS
>
PLANNING
>
MINUTES
>
1990-1999
>
1997
>
PC 01/08/97
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
10/16/2017 3:56:38 PM
Creation date
1/26/2005 3:46:44 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CITY CLERK
CITY CLERK - TYPE
MINUTES
DOCUMENT DATE
1/8/1997
DOCUMENT NAME
PC 1/8/97
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
13
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />f. PUD-90-19-6M. Moller Ranch Develooment <br />Application for a major modification to an approved PUD Development Plan to change the <br />exterior color/material requirements and the methodology used to calculate building height. and <br />to increase the maximum size of the first tier of lots along Foothill Road for the custom lots in <br />the Moller Ranch residential project located to the west/northwest of the Foothill <br />Road/Muirwood Drive street intersection. Zoning for the property is PUD (Planned Unit <br />Development) -RDR/LDR/ A (Rural/Low Density Residential/Agriculture) District, West Foothill <br />Road Corridor Overlay District. <br /> <br />Mr. Iserson presented the staff report for a major modification to an approved PUD Development <br />Plan to change the exterior color/material requirements and the methodology used to calculate <br />building height, to increase the maximum size of the first tier of lots along Foothill Road for the <br />custom lots in the Moller Ranch residential project located to the west/northwest of the Foothill <br />Road/Muirwood Drive intersection. Boulevard Development is interested in these changes to <br />increase the marketability of the lots. Mr. Martinez purchased one of the custom lots. After <br />working with an architect, Mr. Martinez feels he cannot build the type of house he would like on <br />the lot without modification to the Development Plan and Overlay Guidelines. <br /> <br />Mr. Iserson stated that the West Foothill Road Overlay District was formed to preserve the highly <br />rural and aesthetic character of the area while also accommodating residential development. <br /> <br />The applicants would like to expand the allowable color palette to be used by the fourteen custom <br />lots. They would like to go with some very light colors as well as retain some of the darker colors <br />currently allowed. Staff feels the color selection is an important factor so that the homes will blend <br />into the natural setting of the hillside. Staff is quite hesitant to allow the use of lighter colors. <br /> <br />The applicants would also like to change the PUD to allow for a greater amount of stucco on the first <br />tier of homes and to eliminate the requirement for natural materials on the second tier of homes. <br />Stucco is not considered a natural material by the West Foothill Road Overlay District. However, <br />with the ability to mold or articulate stucco, and when viewed from a distance, staff agrees it is hard <br />to tell the difference between stucco and other materials. If the house is well articulated, detailed, <br />and in a dark color, stucco would be acceptable. Staff is willing to support the increased use of <br />stucco. <br /> <br />The applicants have also requested to re-define the method of house height calculation. Mr. Iserson <br />advised that the height is currently determined by measuring the lowest point where the house <br />intersects the grade to the highest point of the roof ridge, and that the total height may be no greater <br />than 30 feet. The applicants feel this is too rigid. The applicants feel this methodology encourages <br />flat pad construction, whereas their proposal would allow 30 feet to be the height of any element of <br />the house as it steps up the hill. In other words, the maximum height would run along a 30 foot line <br />parallel to the slope of the hillside. Staff agrees that the applicants' proposal encourages stepping <br />of houses; however, they don't agree that the current method discourages stepping of houses. The <br />PUD requirements for height, grading, and house size must be taken together. Staff feels all the <br />criteria work together to produce houses that are lower, less massive, and more sensitive to grading. <br />Staff is also opposed to the applicants' calculation because there is no cap on the total house height. <br />When the grading and height limitations are taken together, staff feels the result is a more natural <br />look that is more appropriate to the hillside location. <br /> <br />Planning Commission Minutes <br /> <br />Page 6 <br /> <br />January 8, 1997 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.