Laserfiche WebLink
metered for gas and electric services that results in an inefficient use of utilities compared to an <br />arrangement where each unit was responsible for utility usage. Unfortunately, upgrading this <br />feature would require installation of new electric and gas lines throughout the development that <br />would not only be disruptive but would come at a cost that would most likely be prohibitive for <br />the project to absorb. Based on a review of maintenance issues, the Task Force determined that <br />upgrading, renovating or increasing the number of units at the developments is most likely <br />impractical. <br /> <br />One of the important accomplishments of the Task Force to date has been the establishment of <br />project goals for a new development that could potentially address long-term City and tenant <br />needs. The purpose of this activity was to develop shared goals and development concepts to <br />serve as a basis for a new development. As indicated previously, the initial focus of the Task <br />Force was not to immediately turn its attention to a new development. However, initial work <br />indicated that a new development represents the best alternative to addressing long-term project <br />needs. The goals approved by the Task Force are as follows: <br /> <br />Kottinger Place Task Force Goals <br /> <br />· Develop a mixed income development that provides at least 90 units with a rent structure <br /> consistent with Kottinger Place and Pleasanton Gardens <br />· Increase the number of units consistent with City design standards and zoning. <br /> Additional units will be affordable at levels consistent with project financing. <br />· Development should be viewed in the context of the City's overall housing strategy (both <br /> market and affordable) <br />· Owned and operated by a not for profit housing corporation <br />· Designed for aging in place but retain independent living status <br />· Be energy efficient <br />· Have an architectural design that retains the "garden" feel similar to the existing <br /> developments <br />· Be affordable for perpetuity <br />· Financially self sustaining without the need for ongoing City grants or subsidies <br />· City retains ownership of the Kottinger Place site <br />· Consolidate property management but sites may be owned and developed separately <br />· Assumes demolition of both Pleasanton Gardens and Kottinger Place <br />· Minimize impact of relocation on existing residents <br />· Explore potential for "swapping" Kottinger Place property with portions of Kottinger <br /> Park provided remaining park areas continue to fully address neighborhood needs. <br />· Unit mix of one and two bedroom traits <br /> <br />SR 05:026 <br />Page 3 <br /> <br /> <br />