My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
SR 05:027
City of Pleasanton
>
CITY CLERK
>
AGENDA PACKETS
>
2005
>
SR 05:027
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/7/2005 3:59:07 PM
Creation date
1/5/2005 10:48:44 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CITY CLERK
CITY CLERK - TYPE
STAFF REPORTS
DOCUMENT DATE
1/11/2005
DESTRUCT DATE
15 Y
DOCUMENT NO
SR 05:027
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
68
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
The City has reviewed the Division Street- Del Valle Parkway traffic volumes and intersection <br />on several occasions, each time opting for measures which tend to minimize traffic rather than <br />accommodate it. Del Valle Parkway easterly of Hopyard Road has not been built to its original <br />four-lane configuration, and the General Plan now shows it as a two-lane road. Division Street <br />is likewise not planned to be widened beyond its two-lane configuration. The City most recently <br />chose not to require dedication/reservation of right-of-way at the intersection (from the <br />expanding church) to accommodate the preferred traffic signal lane configuration. A traffic <br />signal while using the existing bridge on Division Street is not practical ifa southbound left-turn <br />lane is included. The existing stop sign was installed as a traffic-calming device, not due to <br />traffic need. <br /> <br />Right-of-way is available for the planned widening (with the caveat about the traffic signal <br />described above). New landscaping has been planted in the area which would be used for <br />widening, particularly southerly of Black Avenue. Between Valley Avenue and Black Avenue, <br />there are already two southbound lanes but one northbound lane until reaching the shopping <br />center at the northerly ends. <br /> <br />There is no new planned development along this route. Funding would be from local traffic fees <br />or City General Fund revenues. <br /> <br />Model Output <br /> <br />To analyze the pros and cons of widening this roadway from a traffic perspective, the traffic <br />forecasting model was used to study roadway users during the morning and evening peak hour <br />to assess: <br /> <br />· Who would use the widened roadway (local or cut-through)? <br />· Where were Pleasanton drivers coming from or going to as they used the road? <br />· What was the purpose of the trip (work, school, shop, recreation, etc.)? <br />· What impact did the roadway widening have on driving times and driving distances for <br /> local drivers? <br />· How did the roadway widening effect traffic volumes at 135 City intersections? <br />· How did the roadway widening effect cut-through traffic in Pleasanton? <br /> <br />The following is a summary of the traffic forecast model outputs assuming Buildout of the 1996 <br />General Plan Land Use and Roadway Network. <br /> · At Buildout, Hopyard Road north of Del Valle Parkway carries about 700 vehicles per <br /> hour (VPH) during the morning peak hour. Without the widening, traffic volumes only <br /> go down by two vehicles per hour during the morning peak hour along Hopyard Road <br /> between Valley Avenue and Del Valle Parkway. <br /> · At Buildout, Hopyard Road north of Del Valle Parkway carries about 1,200 vehicles per <br /> hour (VPH) during the evening peak hour. During the evening peak hour, traffic <br /> <br />SR 05:027 <br />Page 43 <br /> <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.