PC-96-60 - Laserfiche WebLink

Resolution No. PC-96-60 Page 8 9. The developer shall plant additional trees in the landscape area located between the fourth and fifth parking row on a 20' 0' spacing in a single row to create a continuous tree row. This detail shall be shown on the revised landscaping plan provided for review and ap- proval by the Planning Director before issuance of a building permit 10. Before occupancy the applicant shall stencil the parking spaces located immediately in front of the Bank of America building with the wording: "Parking for Bank of America Customers Only". The applicant shall work with representatives of the bank to determine which spaces shall be stenciled. This detail shall be shown on the revised site plan pro- vided for review and approval by the Planning Director before issuance of a building per- mit. II. The applicant shall provide to the Manager of the Bank of America at least 30-days writ- ten notice prior to beginning work in the bank's parking area. A copy of this notice shall be provided to the Planning Director and to the City Attorney. 12. The applicant shall add spandrel glass to the building walls having the arch elements in an alternating pattern above the arches. This detail shall be shown on the revised building elevations for review and approval before issuance of a building permit. 13. The design and materials used on the project's trash enclosure shall match the sloped, standing seam metal roof used on the project's entry feature. This detail shall be shown on the revised building elevations provided for review and approval by the Planning Di- rector before issuance of a building permit. 14. The property owner or its successors in interest (owner) shall enter into a deferred im- provement agreement with the City of Pleasant on (City) to provide that: a. the owner shall either not protest the establishment of an assessment district, or shall affirmatively vote for the creation of the district or other mechanism to pay the construction costs for the I-680fWest Las Positas Boulevard freeway interchange, depending on the manner of creation of the funding mechanism; b. the owner retains the right to protest that the allocation of costs among various properties is inequitable under the above-mentioned funding mechanisms; c. in the event the assessment mechanism appears to impose economically infeasible levels of costs upon the site, the City agrees to explore alternative financing meth- ods; and d. if, with consent by the owner, Section VIII of the previous agreement between the City and Robert E. Meyer, dated June 22, 1982 and recorded as Document No. 82-140679, is substantially changed so that it no longer coincides with the wording of this condition, that this condition shall be superseded by the revised agreement.