Laserfiche WebLink
Ordinance No. 2302 <br /> Page 2 of 11 <br /> Code, and other applicable codes. As such, the Commission concludes this finding <br /> can be made. <br /> 2. Whether the proposed development plan is consistent with the Pleasanton <br /> General Plan and any applicable specific plan. <br /> General Plan Circulation Element Program 7.4, calls for the City to "discourage new <br /> gated communities," and Community Character Element 17.1 calls for"neighborhoods <br /> [to be] open and accessible to one another." Although the General Plan discourages <br /> gated communities, their installation is not prohibited, and there are numerous gated <br /> private streets and communities throughout Pleasanton that have been approved over <br /> time and based on a variety of circumstances and factors justifying their installation. <br /> Some gates may have originally been agricultural gates, gates installed before a <br /> property was annexed into the City, or gates may have been approved prior to or <br /> despite the General Plan program. One such gate is at the base of Silver Oaks <br /> Terrace, within one mile of the subject area. Ruby Hill is a gated community located <br /> off Vineyard Avenue, and recently, the Merritt project, an age-restricted community, <br /> was approved with a gated entrance. As amended by PC Resolution No. 2025-20, <br /> the Vineyard Avenue Corridor Specific Plan allows for gates on private streets if there <br /> are unusual circumstances justifying the installation. Winding Oaks Drive is a private <br /> street serving a limited number of properties, with no through connection that would <br /> be impeded by its installation. Together, these site specific conditions, as well as the <br /> recent break-in attempt, would be considered an "unusual circumstance" that justifies <br /> the installation of a gate, despite the General Plan's broader policy intent to discourage <br /> them. As such, the City Council concludes that this finding can be made. <br /> 3. Whether the proposed development plan is compatible with the previously <br /> developed properties in the vicinity and the natural, topographic features of the <br /> site. <br /> The City Council finds that the proposed project is consistent with the existing <br /> development, in that there will be limited visual impact. Further, agricultural protection <br /> gates are permitted throughout the Vineyard Avenue Corridor Specific Plan area, and <br /> as amended by City Council Resolution No. 2025-067 the Vineyard Avenue Corridor <br /> Specific Plan allows for gates on private streets if there are unusual circumstances <br /> justifying the installation. Further, there are security gates at access points to Ruby Hill <br /> and a gate at the base of Silver Oaks Terrace. The proposed gate would be in keeping <br /> with the amended VACSP and compatible with some of the surrounding subdivisions. <br /> 4. Whether grading in conjunction with the proposed development plan takes into <br /> account environmental characteristics and is designed in keeping with the best <br /> engineering practices to avoid erosion, slides, or flooring, and to have as <br /> minimal an effect upon the environment as possible. <br /> The City Council finds that there is no impact from grading associated with the <br /> proposed gate. Additionally, dust suppression measures will be required as a <br /> Condition of Approval. <br /> 5. Whether streets, buildings, and other manmade structures have been designed <br /> and located in such a manner to complement the natural terrain and landscape. <br /> The Council finds the proposal is reasonably sensitive to existing landscaping, <br /> maintaining the limited on-site vegetation. As conditioned, the gate will not impact <br /> users of the Old Vineyard Avenue Trail or disrupt existing trees or landscaping. <br />