Laserfiche WebLink
<br />that can be developed. For the purpose of evaluating environmental impacts in the <br />1996 General Plan Environmental Impact Report, it was assumed that residential <br />development in the Corridor would yield approximately 480 housing units. <br /> <br />"Vineyard Avenue should be realigned along the Arroyo Del Valle as a two-lane arterial <br />with turn lanes, as needed, and a wide band of landscaping. The existing Vineyard <br />Avenue should be reused as a bikeway, pedestrian path, and limited neighborhood <br />vehicular travel route. " <br /> <br />Busch ProDertv <br /> <br />Modify page II-lO, second full paragraph, sentence 4, to read as follows: ".\ ffillKimam. <br />af f-e1:lf he\ismg umts f)ef aere slis1:lld Be f'ermHted f-er me ~leaitllB DellSity ResiEleatial <br />area, y:itl1 a fl8teRtial iner-ease sf aft aElElitienal eHe writ per aeTe fer a SlifJ8FB 'mu!itienal <br />asaigB' esaeetlt. iI"~~~il!~II\;':~BII'~,~l!l~:~~i!t"1.!I'!:~lli," <br /> <br />Residential Buildout <br /> <br />ModifY page 11-11, third complete paragraph, to read as follows: "If all residential land <br />shown on the General Plan Map were built out (except the San Francisco Water <br />Department Bernal property), Pleasanton would contain approximately 27,000 <br />~?ili~Q\lh.ousing units which would support a residential population of about 69,100 <br />~ttj1lW; exclusive of the San Francisco Water Department Bernal site. Based upon the <br />i;i57 units projected in the 1986 General Plan for this site, as many as 5,800 additional <br />persons might be added, bringing the Planning Area total to 75,200 tt~;!t!)\l This <br />............:-:..........w...... <br />holding capacity estimate assumes that residential land uses are built to average <br />densities (Table 11-4), vacancy rates will average three percent, and household size will <br />level off at 2.65 persons per household at buildout." <br /> <br />Town Square Park <br /> <br />ModifY Program 3.2 on page 11-16, to read as follows: "CsBSiaer the gjl&!I <br />alternatives for developing a Downtown activity center such as a 'town square p'a~k;:ef <br />other paelie speR spRee area t8 SeR"e as a leeatiea fer sataeer e6ffilBlinHy e"leBts. " <br /> <br />Historic Train <br /> <br />ModifY Program 3.5 on page 11-16, to read as follows: "Eaeslifllge II1~i.~ <br />implementation of the historic train concept in the Downtown. Also, study other feasible <br />uses of the Southern Pacific Railroad right-of-way, except for vehicular circulation <br />(parking may be considered)." <br /> <br />3 <br />