My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
PC-96-24
City of Pleasanton
>
BOARDS AND COMMISSIONS
>
PLANNING
>
RESOLUTIONS
>
1990-1999
>
1996
>
PC-96-24
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/15/2006 9:33:12 AM
Creation date
12/29/2004 2:46:19 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CITY CLERK
CITY CLERK - TYPE
RESOLUTIONS
DOCUMENT DATE
4/24/1996
DOCUMENT NO
PC-96-24
DOCUMENT NAME
UP-94-24
NOTES
PATRICIA MCINERNEY/MARY ELLEN ROCHE
NOTES 3
SECOND UNIT WITHIN EXISTING DETACHED UNIT
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
4
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />PLANNING COMMISSION CITY OF PLEASANTON <br />ALAMEDA COUNTY, CALIFORNIA <br />RESOLUTION NO. PC-96-24 <br /> <br />RESOLUTION APPROVING THE APPLICATION OF PATRICIA MCINERNEY <br />AND MARY ELLEN ROCHE ARAKORPI FOR A CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT, AS <br />FILED UNDER CASE UP-94-24 <br /> <br />WHEREAS, Patricia McInerney and Mary Ellen Roche Arakorpi have applied for a conditional <br />use permit to establish a second unit within an existing detached structure located <br />at 1133 Arak Court; and <br /> <br />WHEREAS, zoning for the property is R-I-6,500 Single Family Residential District; and <br /> <br />WHEREAS, at their duly noticed public hearing of April 24, 1996, the Planning Commission <br />considered all public testimony, relevant exhibits, and recommendations of the <br />City staff concerning this application; and <br /> <br />WHEREAS, the Planning Commission made the following findings: <br /> <br />A. The proposed location of the conditional use is in accordance with the objectives <br />of the zoning ordinance and the purpose of the district in which the site is located. <br /> <br />The request to establish a detached second unit on the site conforms with the <br />objectives and purposes of the zoning ordinance. A secondary unit is considered <br />to be a single-family use. The proposal would maintain the existing single-family <br />character because the secondary unit has been designed to integrate with the <br />existing dwelling. In addition, a condition of approval requires that either the <br />primary residence or the secondary unit be owner-occupied and that a maximum <br />of two adults be allowed to reside in the secondary unit (plus any children) to <br />maintain a low density and traffic volume for the neighborhood. <br /> <br />B. The proposed location of the conditional use and the conditions under which it <br />would be operated or maintained will not be detrimental to the public health, <br />safety, or welfare, or materially injurious to the properties or improvements in the <br />vicinity. <br /> <br />Any additional trips from the second unit would be considered minimal and there <br />appears to be ample capacity on the surrounding streets for the approximately 4-6 <br />trips/day which can be expected to be generated by the second unit. The proposed <br />on-site parking spaces are adequate to handle the anticipated parking demands. <br />The subject parcel is approximately 13,800 sq. ft. in area, and the second unit <br />would be set back at least 5 ft. from the nearest property line (west side) and 45 ft. <br />from the nearest neighboring dwelling. Existing landscaping on the rear slope <br />bank screens the second unit from adjacent properties to the rear. In addition, the <br />applicant has designed the second unit to complement the design of the house. <br />Therefore, the second unit would be compatible with the neighborhood. <br /> <br />---r-..------... .----- <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.