My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
PC-97-84
City of Pleasanton
>
BOARDS AND COMMISSIONS
>
PLANNING
>
RESOLUTIONS
>
1990-1999
>
1997
>
PC-97-84
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/15/2006 9:33:09 AM
Creation date
12/29/2004 11:58:07 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CITY CLERK
CITY CLERK - TYPE
RESOLUTIONS
DOCUMENT DATE
10/8/1997
DOCUMENT NO
PC-97-84
DOCUMENT NAME
PUD-96-12
NOTES
MIKE DOMINISSE
NOTES 3
SFH WITH 3-CAR GARAGE
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
9
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />PLANNING COMMISSION CITY OF PLEASANTON <br /> <br />ALAMEDA COUNTY, CALIFORNIA <br /> <br />RESOLUTION NO. PC-97-84 <br /> <br />RESOLUTION RECOMMENDING APPROVAL OF THE APPLICATION OF MIKE <br />DOMINISSE FOR PUD PLAN APPROVAL, AS FILED UNDER CASE POO-96-12 <br /> <br />WHEREAS, Mike Dominisse has applied for Planned Unit Development (POO) plan approval <br />to allow the construction of a 3,540 square foot single family home with a 1,080 <br />square foot three car garage on a 2.43 acre site located at 2500 Vineyard Avenue, <br />generally the southernmost terminus of Pietro nave Lane; and <br /> <br />WHEREAS, zoning for the property is POO-RDR (Planned Unit Development - Rural Density <br />Residential) District; and <br /> <br />WHEREAS, at its duly noticed public hearing of October 8, 1997, the Planning Commission <br />considered all public testimony, relevant exhibits, and recommendations of the City <br />staff concerning this matter; and <br /> <br />WHEREAS, the construction of a single-family home on the existing lot of record is exempt <br />from the provisions of the California Environmental Quality Act; therefore, no <br />environmental document was prepared for this application; and <br /> <br />WHEREAS, the Planning Commission made the following findings: <br /> <br />1. The plan is in the best interests of the public health, safety, and general <br />welfare. <br /> <br />The proposed project, as conditioned, meets all applicable City standards <br />concerning public health, safety, and welfare, e.g. vehicle access, geologic hazards <br />(not within a special studies zone), and flood hazards (not within a flood zone). <br />The proposed development is compatible with the adjacent land uses, as well as <br />the General Plan RDR (Rural Density Residential) designation for this site and all <br />other relevant policies and programs. <br /> <br />2. The plan is consistent with the City's General Plan. <br /> <br />The project site is an existing lot of record. The General Plan allows the <br />construction of single-family homes on existing lots of record provided that other <br />General Plan policies have been met: development outside 100-year flood zone <br />areas, development on stable soils, construction (future) of semi-custom housing <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.