PC-97-66 - Laserfiche WebLink

PLANNING COMMISSION CITY OF PLEASANTON ALAMEDA COUNTY, CALIFORNIA RESOLUTION NO. PC-97-66 RESOLUTION RECOMMENDING APPROVAL OF A NEGATIYE DECLARATION FOR THE APPLICATION OF THE TRUMARK COMPANIES AND PINE STREET PROPERTIES, AS FILED UNDER CASE SPA-97-02 AND PUD-97-08 WHEREAS, Trumark Companies and Pine Street Properties have applied for a Specific Plan Amendment (SPA) and a Planned Unit Development (PUD) to: (1) modifY the adopted Downtown Specific Plan land uses from Auto-Oriented Retail (Office and Commercial Service, either floor) to Mixed Use (Office/Commercial and Residential); 2) rezone the site from Planned Unit Development -- Central Commercial (pUD--C-C) and Planned Unit Development Commercial-Service/Office (pUD--C-S/Office) to Planned Unit Development __ Commercial-Service/Office/High Density Residential (PUD--C-S/O/HDR); and 3) seek development plan approval to construct an approximately 6,100 square foot office building with semi-subterranean parking and 30 small-lot single-family detached homes located at 63, 65, and 73 Ray Street, adjacent to the Alameda County Transportation Corridor; and WHEREAS, zoning for the property is PUD--C-C (Planned Unit Development -- Central Commercial) and PUD--C-S/O (planned Unit Development __ Commercial-Service/Office) District; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission has received and reviewed the Initial Study dated June II, 1997, and received the recommendations of staff; and WHEREAS, at its meeting of August 13, 1997, the Planning Commission received a proposed negative declaration prepared for Case SPA-97-02 and PUD-97-08; and WHEREAS, a duly noticed public hearing was held at which time the public was given the opportunity to comment on the environmental impacts of the proposal; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission has reviewed the potential impacts in accordance with the applicable state and local guidelines governing the preparation of Negative Declarations and Environmental Impact Reports; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission finds that approval of the proposed project would not have any significant adverse effects on the environment; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission further finds that the proposed project would not have any adverse impacts on the site's wildlife.