SR 05:007 - Laserfiche WebLink

DRAFT Director review the colors and ensure that they blend in well with East Bay Regional District guidelines. She noted that the computer renderings made it difficult to determine the true colors and requested that the Planning Director review the colors with the developer one more time before the colors for the house were chosen. Commissioner Blank would like to see denser front coverage of the lot with respect to the trees. He would also like to see mitigation trees planted if any trees were removed or destroyed during construction. Commissioner Fox noted that she could support Commissioner Blank's suggestion. Commissioner Roberts moved to find that the proposed PUD development plan is consistent with the General Plan, the purposes of the PUD ordinance, and the Vineyard Avenue Corridor Specific Plan; to make the PUD findings as listed in the staff report; and to recommend approval of PUD-40 as conditioned in the staff report, with the following modifications that: 1. the house trim colors be shown correctly on the photomontage to be provided for the PUD review by the City Council; 2. that Condition No. 22 be amended to include the tree mitigation requirement for any existing trees that may have been damaged; 3. the Planning Director ensure that the house colors blend in with the natural development to the greatest extent feasible; and 4. that larger and/or denser landscaping shall be added along the berm area at the front of the house. Commissioner Fox seconded the motion. ROLL CALLVOTE: AYES: NOES: ABSTAiN: RECUSED: ABSENT: Commissioners Blank, Fox, Maas and Roberts. None. None. None. Commissioner Arkin. Resolution No. PC-2004-67 was entered and adopted as motioned. DRAFT EXCERPTS: PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING MINUTES, December I0, 2004 Page 4 of 4