My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
SR 05:011
City of Pleasanton
>
CITY CLERK
>
AGENDA PACKETS
>
2005
>
SR 05:011
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
12/22/2004 3:33:37 PM
Creation date
12/22/2004 3:07:13 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CITY CLERK
CITY CLERK - TYPE
STAFF REPORTS
DOCUMENT DATE
1/4/2005
DESTRUCT DATE
15 Y
DOCUMENT NO
SR 05:011
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
6
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Centex Homes, which held an option on the property, subsequently processed a PUD <br />development plan, development agreement, and tentative map for the property. Under the <br />development agreement, Lonestar conveyed to the City a portion of its property (about 1.85 <br />acres) for the realigned Vineyard Avenue, thereby splitting the 30 acres, with about 21.5 acres <br />south of the realigned Vineyard Avenue and 6.65 acres north. In that no residential <br />development is intended north of the realigned Vineyard Avenue, Lonestar has processed a <br />parcel map to formally divide the property in two. It will then seek to detach from the City <br />the northern parcel (6.65 acres) (thereby returning its status to an unincorporated area) and <br />then process a final map on the southern parcel (21.5 acres) consistent with the approved PUD <br />development plan and tentative map. <br /> <br />On December 4, 2004, the City Council conducted a public hearing, and thereafter adopted a <br />resolution, tentatively canceling the Williamson Act contract. One of the conditions of that <br />tentative cancellation is the payment of a cancellation fee to the State. <br /> <br />Lonestar, however, has requested that the cancellation fee be waived. <br /> <br />DISCUSSION <br /> <br />As stated above, in order for the cancellation fees to be waived, the city council must find that <br />it is in the public interest to do so and if the following three things occur: <br /> <br /> 1. The cancellation is caused by change in the use of the land, and the land is not <br />immediately suitable, nor will it be immediately used, for a purpose which produces a greater <br />economic return to the landowner. <br /> <br />Here, with the adoption of the Specific Plan, PUD plan, tentative map and development <br />agreement--which required the dedication of the right of way for the realigned Vineyard <br />Avenue--the ability of the landowner to use the property efficiently and economically for the <br />permitted aggregate mining and quarrying operation was effectively eliminated. Moreover, <br />the cancellation of the fee has been caused by the current land use designation of the property <br />(Planned Unit Development--Medium Density Residential/Open Space/Vineyard District), and <br />the land is not immediately suitable for any other purpose for which a greater economic return <br />to the landowner will be produced. <br /> <br /> 2. It is in the best interests of the program to conserve agricultural land use that the <br />payment is not required. <br /> <br />SR:05:011 <br />Page 3 <br /> <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.