Laserfiche WebLink
<br /> <br /> <br /> <br />RESOLUTION NO. PC-2025-03 <br /> <br />A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF PLEASANTON <br />APPROVING A GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT TO THE LAND USE ELEMENT AND THE <br />HOUSING ELEMENT TO ALLOW FOR THE REQUIRED 3-ACRE PARK/OPEN SPACE ON <br />HOUSING ELEMENT AREA 27 TO BE SPLIT INTO MORE THAN ONE AREA WITHIN THE <br />APPROXIMATELY 10.64-ACRE SITE AT 0 VINEYARD AVENUE (APN 946-4619-1) (P24- <br />0720) <br /> <br />WHEREAS, on October 30, 2024, Robin Miller for Trumark Homes, applied for a General <br />Plan Amendment to the Land Use Element and the Housing Element to allow for <br />the required 3-acre park/open space on housing element Area 27 to be split into <br />more than one area of the within the approximately 10.64-acre site at 0 Vineyard <br />Avenue (APR 946-4619-1) (hereinafter “the Project”); and <br /> <br />WHEREAS, on January 26, 2023, with the adoption of Resolution No. 23-1359, the site was <br />designated Community Facility-School/Housing Element Site Overlay (HESO) in <br />the General Plan; and <br /> <br />WHEREAS, on December 5, 2023, with the adoption of Ordinance 2264, the site was zoned <br />Planned Unit Development (PUD)-Elementary School, with Housing Opportunity <br />Zone (HOZ) overlay; and <br /> <br />WHEREAS, on January 22, 2025, the Planning Commission held a duly-noticed public <br />hearing and considered relevant exhibits, recommendations of the City staff <br />concerning this application, and received testimony from the applicant and <br />interested parties; and <br /> <br />NOW, THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED by the Planning Commission of the City of <br />Pleasanton, based on the entire record of proceedings, including the oral and <br />written staff reports and all public comment and testimony: <br /> <br />Section 1: CEQA Findings. <br /> <br />The Planning Commission finds that the project is categorically exempt from the requirements <br />of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) pursuant to CEQA Guidelines <br />15061(b)(3), because there is no possibility that the proposed general plan <br />amendment will have a significant effect on the environment. Three acres of <br />parks and open space will still be provided on the site and there is no proposed <br />change to the overall site density. <br /> <br />Section 2: <br />The Planning Commission finds that the proposed General Plan Land Use and Housing <br />Element amendments are consistent with the goals and policies of the General <br />Plan. The amendments are consistent with Goal 2, Policy 5, and Program 5.2 of <br />Docusign Envelope ID: 9558053D-A597-48FA-9FE8-0869A03DF887