My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Parks and Recreation Commission Meeting Agenda Packet - 11142024
City of Pleasanton
>
BOARDS AND COMMISSIONS
>
PARKS AND RECREATION
>
2024
>
11142024
>
Parks and Recreation Commission Meeting Agenda Packet - 11142024
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/13/2025 9:17:10 AM
Creation date
1/13/2025 9:16:45 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CITY CLERK
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
56
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
Calculation of Fully Burdened Hourly Rates <br />When reviewing cost estimates for fee related services prepared by City staff, we found relative <br />amounts of consistency in the basic approach to calculating fully burdened hourly rates, described as <br />follows: <br />1. Annual Salary and Benefits per participating staff member <br />2. Divide by 2,080 work hours per year for full time employees, or fraction thereof for part- <br />time employees <br />3. Escalate resulting labor rate by an indirect cost factor of 33.9% <br />Upon review of labor rates calculated by City staff, we approve of this basic approach to labor rate <br />calculation and ultimately deem it to be conservative. Should the City decide to pursue a full <br />comprehensive fee analysis in the future, rates presented in this report will likely result in higher <br />outcomes because what is not included in the cost analysis process described above is review of <br />additional layers of direct and indirect costs at the department and division level that would require a <br />more comprehensive analytical approach to quantify and apply in the hourly rate calculation. <br />We identified two basic opportunities for optimization of the hourly rate calculation and asked City staff <br />to revise their cost calculations for each fee accordingly. First, step two should apply a basis of 1,800 <br />hours for each staff person rather than 2,080 in order to account for basic absences from work such as <br />vacation and sick leave. This practice is aligned with industry standards used in agencies across California <br />for rate calculation, and even still represents a conservative adjustment. Second, we completed a <br />detailed review of the City’s indirect cost rate through a robust overhead cost allocation model, <br />approved by the City’s Finance Department. We are now able to define exactly what costs are recovered <br />at this rate and the revised final indirect cost rate applicable to salary and benefit costs for an individual <br />position is 27.03%. <br />Ancillary Costs <br />Some departments also included the hourly costs of equipment required to support fee for service <br />activities. These hourly equipment rates are established by the Public Works Department, which uses a <br />software service called Maintstar that tracks vehicle use. Rates applied in the software system are <br />derived from the FEMA industry standard report and were not vetted by NBS. Examples include Public <br />Works vehicles and equipment for support of special events, and vehicles required for public safety or <br />other city staff services such as field inspection. In a few fees, the costs of contracted services specific to <br />an event or service were also considered as directly attributable to the fee. We were initially concerned <br />that adding such costs would be double counted in application of the indirect cost factor (step 3); <br />however, after further analysis we agree that equipment and ancillary costs for contract services specific <br />to a fee program or individual fee may be added in addition to the fully burdened labor rates. <br />Data Sources <br />The following data sources were generally used to support the analysis: <br />• Current labor costs for personnel <br />• Current equipment rates, where applicable to the service provided <br />• Indirect Cost Rate(s) for recovery of overhead costs, as established by a Cost Allocation Plan <br />study recently completed by NBS and the City’s finance department <br />Page 23 of 56
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.