_Agenda - Laserfiche WebLink

Request For Proposal: Update to the City of Pleasanton Bicycle and Pedestrian Master Plan Page 5 of 12 K. Disclosure Please identify in the proposal any relationships of the project manager or firm with any of the various stakeholders / property owners in the vicinity of the project that could potentially be impacted by the project. L. Audit Report/Requirements Proposers must agree to abide by the requirements in Chapter III, paragraph 4 of FTA Circular 4220.1F. Every Consultant that has been the subject of any audit report by any government or public agency or qualified independent CPA must attach with its proposal the latest such audit report, including direct labor, materials, fringe benefits and general overhead. Proposers must also agree to submit cost or pricing data in accordance with 48 CFR Part 15.408 Table 15-2. III. EVALUATION AND SELECTION The City of Pleasanton will conduct an initial review of the proposals for general responsiveness and compliance as indicated in the RFP. Proposals failing to satisfy the requirements in this RFP will not be considered. A. Technical Evaluation Criteria The following criteria will be used to evaluate the technical proposals/interview: 1) KEY STAFF’S RELEVANT EXPERIENCE – 30 points Evaluation of this criterion will be based on the Project Manager’s (PM’s), and other key staff’s relevant experience, including staff from subcontractors on similar or related projects for evaluating the feasibility of bicycle lanes, multimodal, and complete streets projects. It should be demonstrated that the proposed PM have the ability to lead a multi-faceted team and the ability to manage schedule and budget in a dynamic environment. 2) WORK PLAN/TECHNICAL APPROACH TO THE PROJECT – 50 points Evaluation of this criterion will be based on the Consultant’s technical approach to the project as described in the scope of work. Key components of this criterion are the proposer’s understanding of the key technical issues for the project, the consultant’s understanding of the key risks and challenges for delivering the project, and the consultant’s ability to articulate succinctly solutions to implement bicycle lanes along the study corridor. The above information shall be integrated within the consultant’s presentation of the following: approach for project management, approach for developing a work plan, approach to project communication, approach to evaluating and selecting feasible alternatives, consideration of local community needs, consideration of a multimodal approach to the project, consideration of existing and future area land development, approach for developing and maintaining schedule, and approach to quality assurance and quality control. The Consultant/Consultant Team should provide visual examples of their technical approach to this project, feasible alternatives, project needs, and identification of challenges or project concerns. 3) ALLOCATION OF LABOR AND PROPOSED SCHEDULE – 10 points