My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
CITY COUNCIL REGULAR MEETING AGENDA PACKET
City of Pleasanton
>
CITY CLERK
>
AGENDA PACKETS
>
2024
>
082024 REGULAR
>
CITY COUNCIL REGULAR MEETING AGENDA PACKET
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/14/2024 11:07:43 AM
Creation date
8/14/2024 10:59:54 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CITY CLERK
CITY CLERK - TYPE
AGENDA REPORT
DOCUMENT DATE
8/20/2024
DESTRUCT DATE
15Y
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
454
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
1 | Page City of Pleasanton Amador Theater programmatic Rehab vs. Build cost comparison 2018-024-02 <br />City of Pleasanton Amador Theater Programmatic <br />Rehabilitation vs. Build Cost Analysis <br />Executive summary <br />The City of Pleasanton is exploring the feasibility of returning ownership of the Amador Theater to the <br />Amador Valley School District. The primary intent is to determine the general cost of rehabilitation in <br />comparison to a new facility with a similar program. Both scenarios would include solutions for the need <br />for removing existing accessibility barriers and improvements to egress, such as a larger lobby that better <br />matches the seating capacity. <br />Rehabilitation of the existing facility $17,403,319 <br />New Construction with similar program: $21,067,500 <br />Brief <br />Interactive Resources was tasked with providing a facility assessment and estimates to inform this goal. The <br />planned task was to provide a facility condition assessment which would be based on existing drawings (if <br />available) from the Division of State Architect (DSA) records. <br />A site visit was made on 11/16/21 with the interactive resources team: architect, structural engineer, and <br />mechanical engineer. Interviews were conducted with city staff and the facility was inspected. <br />The second part was to involve the DSA in providing records for the building if possible and establish the <br />type of regulatory compliance for the facility. It was hoped that improvements in record keeping and digital <br />records would have possibly changed the likelihood of successfully showing hidden existing conditions and <br />being able to establish an original DSA project number. <br />Our research seems to confirm that the DSA records for the theater were lost in a warehouse fire pre- <br />1988, and many further attempts by the DSA to locate other records for the building have been <br />unsuccessful. We have exhausted all existing leads including neighboring building submissions and former <br />architects involved in improvements. We are currently required to proceed with the building considered as <br />“new” under CAC 4-307 and DSA IR EB-4 only refers to certified buildings. This also reinforces the current <br />trend by the California DSA. <br />The extensive communications with the DSA and resulting determination that the building be treated as a <br />new building application changed the nature of the investigation and structural compliance significantly. In <br />response to this, the team was asked by the city to provide assessment information sufficient for a general <br />square footage estimate for both scenarios. <br />ATTACHMENT 3 <br />Page 57 of 454
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.