Laserfiche WebLink
Submitte d O n: <br />Jul 15, 2024, 09:04PM P DT <br />C ity C ouncil Regular M eeting - <br />Submit y our w r itten public <br />comment <br />City of Pleasanton <br />Full Na me F irs t Na me : Todd <br />La s t Na me : Nels on <br />E ma il (this e ntry is dis c lo s a ble <br />if inc lude d)654tnels o n@ gm ail.com <br />C ity C o unc il Me e ting Da te July 16, 2024 <br />Me e ting Type Regular Meeting at 7 P M <br />Age nda Ite m Numbe r 18 <br />C o mme nts I under s tand that the WLP r oa dway r econs tr uctio n is extr e me ly <br />e xpens ive. I a ls o under s ta nd tha t cer tain gr ant funding ca n o nly be <br />us ed fo r bike/ped infr as tr uctur e. It's not clear to m e how r oadway <br />r eco ns tr uction and bike/ped expens e s will be kept s epar ate. My <br />co mment on this item is pr im ar ily to ques tio n the "pr io r ity matr ix" in <br />the age nda r epor t for item #18. <br />In the 2010 Mas ter P lan, pa r ts of WLP wer e identifie d a s pr ior ities for <br />bike/ped impr o vem ents , notably fr om Owens to S anta Rita and fr o m <br />S anta Rita to Fair lands . Tho s e wer en't completed. In 2018, the WLP <br />co r r idor was identifie d a nd much o f the co m munity's focus was <br />a gain fr om O we ns to S a nta Rita to Fair lands . This was a clea r <br />pr ior ity. The collis io n his tor y als o indicated tha t thes e s ectio ns had <br />s ignificant s afety concer ns . At the time , Toole was the co ns ulta nt. We <br />a ll came to a co ns ens us o n a de s ign. <br />T hen s taff change d co ns ultants and the new o ne dr ew up a new <br />plan. I r ecall being told that the new de s ign r efle cted what the <br />co mmunity r ea lly wanted - unlike Toole's des ign. I do n't know what <br />this was bas ed o n; we wer e jus t told. The cor r ido r pr oject was <br />o r iginally br o ken into fo ur s ections to be im plem ented o ver s ix <br />phas es , if I r ecall co r r e ctly. The s ectio n fr om O wens to S anta Rita <br />a nd was las t, in contr as t with B P TC's pr e fer ence, and Fair lands was <br />e xclude d. <br />T his new agenda r epo r t pr ior itizes nine s ections of WLP - this is new <br />s egm entation. <br />T he pr ior ity m atr ix has a co lumn for "B ike & Pe d" im por ta nce. To the <br />bes t of m y kno wledge, no o ne in the bike /pe d co mmunity was <br />involved. T he "gap" in bike lanes exis ts fr om Hacienda to S anta Rita. <br />T he bigges t "s afety" co ncer n, if I r ecall cor r ectly, is fr o m O wens to <br />S anta Rita. T he "pr e s ence of s chools " ne eds to be de fined becaus e <br />we've a lways talked about the entir e cor r idor being a r o ute to