My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
SUPPLEMENTAL MATERIAL
City of Pleasanton
>
CITY CLERK
>
AGENDA PACKETS
>
2024
>
0604
>
SUPPLEMENTAL MATERIAL
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/4/2024 12:43:41 PM
Creation date
6/4/2024 12:43:34 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CITY CLERK
CITY CLERK - TYPE
AGENDA REPORT
DOCUMENT DATE
6/4/2024
DESTRUCT DATE
15Y
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
9
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
3 <br /> <br />negotiated as part of the broader agreement, all of which are supported by staff, <br />are outlined in the Agenda Report. <br /> <br />Library and Recreation <br /> <br />Agenda Item #8 <br />1. Besides the nonresident fee and access and information collection, are there <br />other requirements in the original guidelines that are simply going away? <br />A. Some additional, less significant items proposed to change, include: (Note: Both <br />the original and the proposed Management Plans are included in the agenda <br />packet for reference.) <br /> <br />• Removal of the etiquette guidelines at the beginning of the original exhibit. <br />These were no longer deemed accurate nor necessary. A guard is on duty <br />24/7 at the gate and no key cards have ever been issued for access. Any <br />information included in this section is provided by the security guard at the <br />gate upon entry. <br />• In the original exhibit, Pleasanton residents were to receive an annual <br />pass. This was never practical, so City staff and Golden Eagle staff <br />developed the acceptable forms of resident identification as described in <br />Item 3 of the proposed Management Plan. <br />• Some other items deemed to be unnecessary were eliminated as well, <br />such as special signage and striping. As this has not been deemed <br />necessary or such signage already exists, it was removed from the <br />original Management Plan (items 11, 12,13). Much of this information is <br />included in what the City will be publishing in the proposed Management <br />Plan (Item 13). <br /> <br />2. How have the meetings between Golden Eagle Estates staff and community <br />residents been publicized? <br />A. This item was listed on an open agenda meeting for board discussion. <br />An e-blast was sent to all Golden Estates residents and posted on website. <br /> <br />3. Non-resident fees for usage are not listed on Exhibit A and it says to refer to the <br />website. Can these fees be listed on our report? <br />A. Per the Master Fee Schedule, this fee would fall in Section VIII, Category E <br />(mostly individual benefits and non-residents). Staff intend to start this fee at $5 <br />for the pass and assess true costs for issuing the permits throughout the first <br />year of the new process. Because the process can be completed online through <br />the CivicRec platform, staff believes that true costs will be limited and $5 will be <br />an appropriate fee. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.