My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
CITY COUNCIL REGULAR MEETING AGENDA PACKET
City of Pleasanton
>
CITY CLERK
>
AGENDA PACKETS
>
2024
>
0521
>
CITY COUNCIL REGULAR MEETING AGENDA PACKET
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
5/29/2024 11:11:03 AM
Creation date
5/29/2024 11:03:08 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CITY CLERK
CITY CLERK - TYPE
AGENDA REPORT
DOCUMENT DATE
5/21/2024
DESTRUCT DATE
15Y
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
720
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br /> <br /> Managing Tomorrow’s Resources Today <br /> <br /> <br />ZeeLaura Page <br />May 8, 2024 <br />Page 2 of 8 <br /> <br />Table 1: Summary Financial Impacts <br />(Includes all street classifications) <br /> Note: Numbers may not sum exactly due to rounding. <br />Tables 2 through 4 below illustrate the impact of vehicle types by road classification, which combine to the <br />system-wide values presented above in Table 1. It is worth noting that the vast majority of the impacts of <br />Refuse Vehicles occur on the residential street type. Residential streets are designed to the lowest standard <br />of all streets in the City. Their primary function is to provide access to individual residential properties for <br />motorized vehicles, bicycles, and pedestrians. The residential streets are not designed to accommodate the <br />frequency and loading of a Refuse Vehicle. A collector street is a low-to-moderate capacity road that moves <br />traffic from residential streets to arterials. These types of streets are designed to a higher standard than <br />residential streets to accommodate larger vehicles and more volume. Arterial streets provide direct, <br />relatively high-speed service for longer trips and large traffic volumes and are designed to the highest <br />standard. <br />It should be noted that reasonable ranges exist for various key assumptions used in our analysis, and that <br />the analysis is extremely sensitive to changes in certain key assumptions. HF&H provides discussion of key <br />assumptions and sensitivities later in this report. In several cases, this report relied on representations <br />made by City staff and Pleasanton Garbage Service (which we assumed to be informed and dependable). <br />@ Current Funding <br />922,800$ 8.3% <br />832,300$ 7.5% <br />1,036,900$ 9.3% <br />45,000$ 0.4% <br />38,700$ 0.3% <br />34,200$ 0.3% <br />2,909,800$ 26.1% <br />8,229,700$ 73.9% <br />11,139,500$ 100.0%TOTAL <br />ALL OTHER VEHICLES SUBTOTAL <br />Percent of Total <br />Impacts <br />Residential Solid Waste Vehicles <br />Residential Recycling Vehicles <br />Residential Organics Vehicles <br />Commercial Recycling Vehicles <br />Street Maintenance Cost <br />ImpactVehicle Type <br />Commercial Organics Vehicles <br />PGS VEHICLE SUBTOTAL <br />Commercial Solid Waste Vehicles <br />Page 42 of 720
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.