My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
AGENDA FULL PACKET
City of Pleasanton
>
BOARDS AND COMMISSIONS
>
PLANNING
>
AGENDA PACKETS
>
2020 - PRESENT
>
2024
>
04-10
>
AGENDA FULL PACKET
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
5/20/2024 3:44:15 PM
Creation date
5/20/2024 3:41:09 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CITY CLERK
CITY CLERK - TYPE
AGENDA REPORT
DOCUMENT DATE
4/10/2024
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
124
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
P23-0599, 5976 & 5994 W. Las Positas Blvd. Planning Commission <br />7 of 8 <br />The General Plan's Mixed Use designation references and defers to the applicable Planned <br />Unit Development (see General Plan starting at Page 2-24). Specifically, the General Plan <br />states: “The location of specific land uses in areas designated Mixed Use is determined by the <br />associated PUD zoning or specific plan.” In this instance, the Hacienda PUD designates the <br />subject parcel/site (Lot 20) as Garden Office (OGPD), which does not permit residential <br />development except Nursing Homes/Assisted Living Facilities. (See General Plan Page 2-25.) <br /> <br />Therefore, because the application for Design Review for residential development is not <br />consistent with this General Plan policy and the zoning for the property, staff recommends that <br />the Planning Commission deny the application. <br /> <br />Vesting Tentative Tract Map Application <br />The state’s Subdivision Map Act (Government Code § 66410 et seq.) provides in relevant part <br />that “[a] local agency shall disapprove a map for failure to meet or perform any of the <br />requirements or conditions imposed by this division or local ordinance enacted pursuant <br />thereto . . . .” (Government Code § 66473.) The Subdivision Map Act also provides in relevant <br />part that “[a] legislative body of a city or county shall deny approval of a tentative map, or a <br />parcel map for which a tentative map was not required, if it makes any of the following findings: <br />(a) That the proposed map is not consistent with applicable general and specific plans . . . .” <br />(Government Code § 66474.) <br /> <br />As mentioned above, the General Plan's Mixed Use designation references and defers to the <br />applicable Planned Unit Development (see General Plan Page 2-23). Specifically, the General <br />Plan states: “The location of specific land uses in areas designated Mixed Use is determined <br />by the associated PUD zoning or specific plan.” In this instance, the Hacienda PUD <br />designates the subject parcel/site (Lot 20) as Garden Office (OGPD), which does not permit <br />residential development except for Nursing Homes/Assisted Living Facilities. Therefore, the <br />Vesting Tentative Tract Map application is not consistent with this General Plan policy. <br /> <br />Additionally, the City’s Subdivision Ordinance provides in relevant part that “[n]o land shall be <br />subdivided and developed for any purpose not contemplated or specifically authorized by the <br />precise zoning ordinance of the city.” (PMC § 19.04.020.) <br /> <br />Because the Vesting Tentative Tract Map application is not consistent with the General Plan <br />policy, as referenced above, and the zoning for the property, staff recommends that the <br />Planning Commission deny the application. <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.