My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
AGENDA FULL PACKET
City of Pleasanton
>
BOARDS AND COMMISSIONS
>
PLANNING
>
AGENDA PACKETS
>
2020 - PRESENT
>
2024
>
03-27
>
AGENDA FULL PACKET
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
5/20/2024 3:37:56 PM
Creation date
5/20/2024 3:36:32 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CITY CLERK
CITY CLERK - TYPE
AGENDA REPORT
DOCUMENT DATE
3/27/2024
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
138
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
PUD-149, 544 Sycamore Rd. Planning Commission <br />5 of 8 <br /> <br />ANALYSIS <br />Consistency with General Plan Zoning District Regulations: <br />General Plan <br />The existing single-family dwelling unit and proposed development standards of the <br />R-1-40,000 District would be consistent with the low-density designation. <br /> <br />The proposal is in keeping with the character of the low density residential and is <br />consistent with the General Plan Land Use Policy and Programs listed below. <br /> <br />Land Use: Residential <br />Policy 8: Preserve and enhance the character of existing residential <br />neighborhoods. <br /> <br />Program 8.1: Enforce the provisions of the City’s Zoning Ordinance and related <br />planning ordinances to maintain the character of existing residential <br />neighborhoods. <br /> <br />Program 8.2: Use the City’s development review procedures to minimize <br />intrusions into existing neighborhoods. <br /> <br />Zoning <br />The NSSP indicates the PUD-A zoning district is intended to correspond “generally” to <br />the Agricultural (A) District of the Pleasanton Municipal Code (PMC) as modified in the <br />NSSP. As such, staff has analyzed the proposal in relation to the Agricultural district in <br />the PMC. However, it should be noted that the PUD district allows flexibility in creating <br />development standards, and the applicant proposes following the standards of the <br />R-1-40,000 zoning district rather than the A-district. Additionally, as further detailed in <br />the following sections, the proposed site and building design meet the NSSP guideline s. <br /> <br />The subject approximately 0.99-acre (43,484-square-foot) lot is substantially smaller <br />than the lot minimum required in the PMC A-district (i.e., 5 acres), however, the PUD <br />district allows for flexibility. The lot, which is existing based on prior subdivision of land, <br />better conforms to the minimum lot size required in the PMC R-1-40,000-district (i.e., <br />40,000-square-feet). As such, staff recommends following the R-1-40,000 standards. <br /> <br />Table 1, below, is a comparison of the development standards in the A-district, <br />proposed development standards (R-1-40,000), and the proposed project. The project <br />meets the R-1-40,000-district standards in all respects. <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.