Laserfiche WebLink
Page 2 of 7 <br />Traffic Analysis Summary <br />A comprehensive traffic analysis was prepared by TJKM, a professional traffic engineering <br />firm, and was peer reviewed by the City’s Traffic Engineering Division. The traffic study is <br />included for reference as Attachment 2. It is noted that the City does not typically require a <br />traffic study when there would be less than 100 new vehicle trips; however, the applicant <br />elected to prepare a study in the interest of providing more comprehensive analysis to the City. <br />The traffic analysis provides a table that compares the existing uses to the proposed uses in <br />terms of number of vehicle trips produced. This comparison shows the possible change in <br />traffic due to the proposed development. The table identifies the uses and the square footage, <br />then uses the square footages to convert into morning (AM) peak hour, and evening (PM) <br />vehicle trips based on published rates collected by the Institute of Traffic Engineers (ITE). <br />Traffic studies typically utilize the AM (7-9 AM) and PM (4:30 – 6:30 PM) peak hours because <br />those are the busiest periods on Pleasanton roadways. Per the Pleasanton General Plan, the <br />City considers an acceptable Level of Service (LOS) to be LOS D or better. LOS is the metric <br />used to evaluate the performance of intersections, based on the amount of delay experienced <br />by motorists when passing through or making turning movements at the intersection. <br />The table shows that the existing church and day care are assumed to generate 49 trips in the <br />AM peak hour and 56 trips in the PM peak hour, with the majority of the trips resulting from the <br />day care. The table shows that the proposed 57 multifamily housing units are assumed to <br />generate 41 AM peak hour trips and 45 PM peak hour trips (both lower than the existing uses). <br />While the ITE rates provide the hypothetical trips generated, those figures are typically verified <br />through field observations. In this case, site reviews conducted by staff found that the existing <br />church/day care’s actual trip generation is somewhat lower than the number predicted based <br />on ITE rates. <br />The TJKM report used daily volumes on Hopyard Road posted on the City’s website. This data <br />was collected in February 2020 (Page 2 paragraph 3), which was before the 2020 COVID stay- <br />at-home orders were issued. For the peak hour analysis, TJKM used measured 2023 peak <br />hour volumes since these volumes are beginning to reflect pre-pandemic volumes. To be <br />conservative in the review of the traffic study and the existing conditions, staff evaluated the <br />proposed 57-unit project against volumes collected in 2019 which are still slightly higher than <br />current traffic volumes. Evaluation of the intersections using the 2019 data is a more <br />conservative analysis.