My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
AGENDA FULL PACKET
City of Pleasanton
>
BOARDS AND COMMISSIONS
>
PLANNING
>
AGENDA PACKETS
>
2020 - PRESENT
>
2024
>
02-28
>
AGENDA FULL PACKET
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
5/20/2024 3:21:13 PM
Creation date
5/20/2024 3:15:28 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CITY CLERK
CITY CLERK - TYPE
AGENDA REPORT
DOCUMENT DATE
2/28/2024
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
108
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
P23-0177 & Tract 8672, 3200 Hopyard Road <br />Planning Commission <br />5 of 12 <br />project will also incorporate bicycle storage areas in each garage for residents that utilize <br />alternative commutes and provides EV ready parking spaces. The project will be conditioned <br />to meet the City’s all-electric reach code, consistent with CAP 2.0 Strategy P.1. <br /> <br />6th Cycle Housing Element <br />The project site is listed in the 6th Cycle Housing Element sites inventory (listed as APN 941 <br />090706200 in Housing Element Table B-14) with the project to provide 44 moderate-income <br />units. The project proposes 48 units for above-moderate-income households and nine units for <br />lower-income residents. As proposed, the project exceeds the inventory’s estimates by offering <br />nine more units for lower-income residents and 48 more units for above-moderate income <br />households. Simultaneously, the proposal falls short by 44 units for moderate-income <br />households per the Housing Element projections. <br /> <br />However, the site inventory allows for a surplus of 56 units beyond the City's designated <br />894-unit allocation for moderate-income housing under the regional housing needs <br />assessment (RHNA). Approving the project would not require rezoning additional sites to meet <br />the moderate-income RHNA. <br /> <br />Zoning and Uses Conformance <br />The subject site has a zoning designation of RM-1,500 District. The project, pursuant to SB <br />330 and SDBL, aligns with the zoning district’s permitted uses and site-prescribed <br />development standards pursuant to the Pleasanton Municipal Code (PMC), except with <br />respect to items requests a concession or waiver pursuant to SDBL, and as further described <br />in the next section of this report. <br /> <br />Conformance with Site Development Standards <br />The project is subject to the prescribed development standards for the RM-1,500 District. The <br />site development standards for the zoning district are included in Table 2. As mentioned <br />above, per SDBL, the project is eligible to request incentives and concessions, and waivers or <br />reductions to development standards. The applicant has requested one incentive and 11 <br />waivers, which are summarized below in Table 2. <br /> <br />The applicant has requested the incentive and waivers from site development standards for <br />the purpose of accommodating the proposed number of units at the allowed density (8+ du/ac) <br />for the site and meet open space and circulation requirements. The majority of the waiver <br />requests are related to spatial aspects of the project such as setbacks, lot area, FAR, parking, <br />etc. Additionally, the applicant requests a height waiver to exceed the maximum height <br />allowed of 30 feet to 34 feet to allow the project to fit onto the property as designed. Without <br />the incentive and waivers, the applicant cites that the objective development standards hinder <br />the project that is within the allowed density. In addition, the applicant cites the requests to be <br />cost-saving, which in turn would provide affordable housing as part of the project. Staff has <br />assessed the incentive and waiver requests in conjunction with SDBL and believes the request <br />for waiver is appropriately needed to accommodate the site’s allowable density, and non e <br />would have an adverse impact on health and safety, the physical environment, or historic <br />resources. Please see Exhibit D for full request details per SDBL. <br /> <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.