Laserfiche WebLink
Resolution No. PC-2024-04 <br />Page Three <br /> <br /> <br />Commission finds that the proposed single-story residences with generous <br />setbacks are compatible with the land use pattern in the neighborhood and <br />previously developed properties in the vicinity. The subject lot is relatively flat <br />with mature existing vegetation. As such, the Planning Commission finds the <br />residence is sensitive to the existing trees and vegetation on-site. The <br />proposed site improvements relate well to the proposed residence as well as <br />the existing residence on-site. The Planning Commission concludes that this <br />finding can be made. <br /> <br />4. Whether grading in conjunction with the proposed development plan <br />takes into account environmental characteristics and is designed in <br />keeping with the best engineering practices to avoid erosion, slides, or <br />flooring, and to have as minimal an effect upon the environment as <br />possible. <br /> <br />The Planning Commission finds that grading is kept to a minimum and is only <br />proposed for the proposed additions. The project would be in keeping the <br />existing environmental characteristics of the of the property. In addition, the <br />flood hazard maps of the Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) <br />indicate the subject property is not located in a flood hazard zone. The <br />subject parcel will drain to the face-of-curb and excess stormwater runoff <br />would be directed into public street storm drains. As such, the Planning <br />Commission concludes this finding can be made. <br /> <br />5. Whether streets, buildings, and other manmade structures have been <br />designed and located in such a manner to complement the natural <br />terrain and landscape. <br /> <br />The proposed development plan does not include the extension of any new <br />public streets. The subject parcel is relatively flat and consists of an existing <br />single-family residence and accessory structures; no significant changes or <br />modifications to the site or natural terrain are propose d. The Planning <br />Commission finds the proposed development plan is sensitive to existing <br />landscaping, maintaining a majority of the mature vegetation on-site. Given <br />the existing single-family residence’s large setbacks, extensive landscaping, <br />and articulated building design the scale is appropriate. The architectural style <br />and detailing of the existing single-family residence are compatible with the <br />existing neighborhood. As such, the Planning Commission concludes this <br />finding can be made. <br /> <br />6. Whether adequate public safety measures have been incorporated into <br />the design or the proposed development plan. <br /> <br />At this time, the proposed development plan does not propose a new site <br />design or accessory structures, only attached additions consisting of new <br />living space, deck, and patio. The existing residence received approval from <br />Alameda County at the time of its construction and was designed to meet the <br />requirements of the California Building Code and applicable County codes at <br />DocuSign Envelope ID: 614C9B16-E565-4B07-B7C8-F8D5E489411C