Laserfiche WebLink
Resolution No. PC-2024-04 <br />Page Two <br /> <br /> <br />The Planning Commission finds that the proposed project, as conditioned, <br />meets all applicable City standards concerning public health, safety, and <br />welfare. The project will not generate volumes of traffic that cannot be <br />accommodated by existing City streets and intersections in the area. The <br />proposed development plan is designed in conformance with the Pleasanton <br />General Plan designation for this site and all other relevant policies and <br />programs. Any additional development on the subject parcel will be designed <br />to meet the requirements of this development plan, the California Building <br />Code, California Fire Code, and other applicable codes. As such, the <br />Planning Commission concludes this finding can be made. <br /> <br />2. Whether the proposed development plan is consistent with the <br />Pleasanton General Plan and any applicable specific plan. <br /> <br />The proposed development plan includes establishing development <br />standards of the R-1-40,000 District and construct an approximately 1,117- <br />square-foot addition to the front, an approximately 65-square-foot attached <br />front covered porch, and an approximately 160-square-foot attached rear <br />covered porch to an existing single-family residence on an approximately <br />0.99-acre lot. The Planning Commission finds the existing single-family <br />residence and lot size conforms to the General Plan Low-Density Residential <br />land use designation with a maximum of two dwelling units per gross <br />developable acre. The proposed development plan promotes General Plan <br />Programs and Policies encouraging the preservation of the existing housing <br />stock and preserving and enhancing the character of existing residential <br />neighborhoods. <br /> <br />In addition to the General Plan, the proposed project is consistent with the <br />intent of the North Sycamore Specific Plan (NSSP). There is no Planned Unit <br />Development plan for the subject lot, but th e NSSP details general guidelines <br />that the subject lot should follow. The proposal is consistent with the <br />guidelines including setbacks, density, and character of the subject lot. <br /> <br />The NSSP notes development should correspond generally to the Agricultural <br />(A) district. The project proposes to conform to the R-1-40,000 District <br />standards based on the fact that this existing, subdivided property is <br />approximately 0.99 acres (i.e., approximately 43,124 square feet in size). <br />Given the large proposed setbacks, and proposed building design, the scale <br />meets the intent of the A-district. As such, the Planning Commission <br />concludes that this finding can be made. <br /> <br />3. Whether the proposed development plan is compatible with the <br />previously developed properties in the vicinity and the natural, <br />topographic features of the site. <br /> <br />The neighborhood includes a mixture of one-and-two-story residences with a <br />variety of architectural styles sited with large setbacks, reflecting the rural <br />residential character of the NSSP area more generally. As such, the <br />DocuSign Envelope ID: 614C9B16-E565-4B07-B7C8-F8D5E489411C