PC-2024-03 - Laserfiche WebLink

Resolution No. PC-2024-03 Page 5 5 emergency access easement. The design of the subdivision and related improvements does not conflict with the proposed easements. 8. The restriction on approving a tentative subdivision map on land covered by a land conservation contract entered into pursuant to the California Land Conservation Act of 1965 (Williamson Act) is not applicable. The site is not covered by any land conservation contract, including a Williamson Act contract. 9. The discharge of waste from the proposed subdivision would not result in violation of existing requirements prescribed by the California Regional Water Quality Control Board (RWQCB). No discharge violation currently exists and sewer capacity is available for this subdivision. The project would not discharge any waste other than domestic sewage and all sewage would be discharged into the city’s sanitary sewer system for ultimate treatment. Stormwater runoff would be collected and conveyed through bio-retention basins. Urban stormwater runoff is required to meet the City’s RWQCB permit requirements for urban development. Findings Pursuant to Government Code Section 65863 (No Net Loss) Option 1: Option 1 would include 48 above-moderate income units and 9 lower-income apartment units; in comparison, the inventory of sites included in the 6 th Cycle Housing Element projected that this site (listed as APN 941 090706200 in Table B -14) would provide up to 44 moderate income units. Option 1 would provide 9 more lower-income units, and 48 more above-moderate units than projected in the inventory, but 44 fewer moderate-income units. However, the inventory of sites provides a buffer of 56 units in excess of the City’s assigned 894-unit moderate income regional housing needs allocation (RHNA). As a result, the approval of Option 1 would not require re-zoning of additional sites to meet the moderate income RHNA. Option 2: Option 2 includes 47 above-moderate income units and 8 moderate-income apartment units; in comparison, the inventory of sites included in the 6 th Cycle Housing Element projected that this site (listed as APN 941 090706200 in Table B -14) would provide up to 44 moderate income units. Option 2 would provide 47 more above-moderate units than projected in the inventory, but 36 fewer moderate-income units. However, the inventory of sites provides a buffer of 56 units in excess of the City’s assigned 894 -unit moderate income regional housing needs allocation (RHNA). As a result, the approval of Option 2 would not require re-zoning of additional sites to meet the moderate income RHNA. Section 3. Approves Design Review Case No. P23-0177 and Vesting Tentative Map 8672, the applications of Catalyst Development Partners LLC to subdivide an approximately 2.99-acre site located at 3200 Hopyard Road into nine parcels for condominium purposes of either the original (Option 1) or the alternative design (Option DocuSign Envelope ID: 534DDD13-114A-4B56-B95F-D2A0315F7BF5