Laserfiche WebLink
Resolution No. PC-2024-03 <br />Page 3 <br /> <br /> 3 <br />given to mechanical equipment or other utility hardware on roof, ground or <br />buildings; <br />8. Integration of signs as part of the architectural concept; and <br />9. Architectural concept of miscellaneous structures, street furniture, public art in <br />relationship to the site and landscape. <br />Findings for Vesting Tentative Map 8672 <br />State law and the Zoning Ordinance of the Pleasanton Municipal Code (PMC) set forth <br />the considerations to be addressed in reviewing a Vesting Tentative Map. The Planning <br />Commission makes the following findings for Option 1 and Option 2 that each Vesting <br />Tentative Map 8672 conforms to the purposes of the PMC: <br /> <br />1. The proposed vesting tentative subdivision map conforms to the zoning <br />regulations/development plan. <br /> <br />The Vesting Tentative Map and improvements for Option 1 and Option 2 each <br />conform to the Design Review development plan and site development standards of <br />P23-0177. The map and improvements, therefore, would conform to the underlying <br />RM-1,500 zoning district. <br /> <br />2. The design of the subdivision provides, to the extent feasible, for future <br />passive or natural heating or cooling opportunities. <br /> <br />As approved and conditioned in the Design Review development plan, t he <br />condominiums in Option 1 and Option 2 will each comply with the City’s residential <br />Green Building Ordinance, Climate Action Plan 2.0 and the State’s Title 24 Building <br />Energy Efficiency Standards and would be required to incorporate a series of <br />renewable energy design and energy efficiency features. <br /> <br />3. The proposed vesting tentative subdivision map, together with its design and <br />improvement, is consistent with the Pleasanton General Plan. <br /> <br />P23-0177 is found to be consistent with the Pleasanton General Plan and Vesting <br />Tentative Map 8672 was submitted based on Option 1 and Option 2. The proposed <br />subdivision and its improvements for Option 1 and Option 2 are each compatible <br />with the applicable objectives, policies, land uses, and programs specified in the <br />General Plan. <br /> <br />4. The subdivision site is physically suitable for this type and density of <br />development. <br /> <br />DocuSign Envelope ID: 534DDD13-114A-4B56-B95F-D2A0315F7BF5