My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
CITY COUNCIL AGENDA PACKET
City of Pleasanton
>
CITY CLERK
>
AGENDA PACKETS
>
2024
>
041624
>
CITY COUNCIL AGENDA PACKET
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
4/12/2024 12:30:38 PM
Creation date
4/12/2024 12:23:30 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CITY CLERK
CITY CLERK - TYPE
AGENDA REPORT
DOCUMENT DATE
4/16/2024
DESTRUCT DATE
15Y
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
559
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Page 2 of 4 <br />Fees and Charges1: <br />• Except for licensing and other regulatory fees, fees and charges may not exceed the <br />“actual cost” of providing the product or service for which the fee is charged. “Actual <br />cost” is the “minimum amount necessary.” The burden to prove the fee or charge does <br />not exceed “actual cost” is changed to “clear and convincing” evidence. <br />• Requires fees and charges paid for the use of local and state government property and <br />the amount paid to purchase or rent government property to be “reasonable.” These <br />fees and charges are currently allowed to be market-based. Whether the amount is <br />“reasonable” (introducing a new legal standard aiming to force below market fee and <br />charge amounts) must be proved by "clear and convincing evidence."2 The standard <br />may significantly reduce the amount large companies (e.g., oil, utilities, gas, railroads, <br />garbage/refuse, cable, and other corporations) will pay for the use of local public <br />property. <br />• Prohibits fees on new development based on vehicle miles traveled. <br /> <br />Taxes3: <br />• Taxes and fees adopted after January 1, 2022, that do not comply with the new rules <br />are void unless reenacted.4 <br />• Invalidates the Upland decision that allows a majority of local voters to pass special <br />taxes. The measure specifies that taxes proposed by the initiative are subject to the <br />same rules as taxes placed on the ballot by a city council. <br />• Expressly prohibits local advisory measures which allow local voters to express a <br />preference for how local general tax dollars should be spent.5 <br />• Requires voter approval to expand existing taxes (e.g., Utility, Transient Occupancy) to <br />new territory (e.g., annexations) or to expand the tax base (e.g., new utility service). <br />• New taxes can only be imposed for a specific time period. <br />• City charters may not be amended to include a tax or fee. <br />• All state taxes require majority voter approval. <br /> <br />Fines and Penalties6: <br />• May require voter approval of fines, penalties, and levies for corporations and property <br />owners that violate state and local laws unless a new, undefined adjudicatory process is <br />used to impose the fines and penalties. <br />• Local governments levy a variety of fees and other charges to provide core public <br />services. <br /> <br />Major examples of affected fees and charges are: <br />• Nuisance abatement charges, such as for weed, rubbish, and general nuisance <br />abatement to fund community safety, code enforcement, and neighborhood cleanup <br />programs. <br />Page 42 of 559
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.